PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2015JAMA2,171 citationsOpen Access

Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

View Full Paper
LSLesley StewartMCMike ClarkeMRMaroeska M. Rovers

Key Points

  • To establish clear reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of individual participant data (IPD).
  • Developed PRISMA-IPD guidelines for systematic reviews.
  • Focused on enhancing clarity and transparency in reporting.
  • Targeted researchers conducting IPD analyses.
  • Improved consistency in reporting systematic reviews.
  • Enhanced ability to synthesize findings from unique participant-level data.
  • Indicated a need for adherence to the established guidelines.

Abstract

PRISMA-IPD provides guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of IPD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stewart et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6970ddc8cfea4c1fcf6a58d6https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.3656
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper