PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026JACOW0 citationsOpen Access

New photon BPM setup using SiC devices in photoconductive mode

View Full Paper
MCMatija ColjaGBG. BrajnikGCG. Cautero

Key Points

  • To develop a novel approach for detecting photon beam intensity and position using silicon carbide sensors.
  • Proposed a matrix of silicon carbide sensors in photoconductive mode placed after the synchrotron source.
  • Sensors detect both bending magnet and insertion device radiation separately.
  • Conducted initial tests to evaluate sensor sensitivity and discrimination capabilities.
  • Achieved sub-micron sensitivity in beam detection.
  • Successfully distinguished between bending magnet and insertion device contributions to the photon beam.

Abstract

Photon Beam Position Monitors (pBPM) detect photon beam intensity and position in synchrotron light sources and are capable to operate in real time during experiments, without altering beam properties and ideally discriminating between insertion device (ID) and bending magnet (BM) radiation. Early approaches used metallic blades based on photoemission from beam tails, but failed with micrometric beams or too high energy photons. They were also unable to distinguish between BM and ID radiation. Newer techniques based on CVD diamond detectors, using charge collection in four quadrants, work well at high energies but absorb too much at soft X-rays or lower energies. Thinning sensors down to the nanometer scale is technically challenging and does not solve the problem of light source discrimination. We propose an innovative method using intrinsic silicon carbide (SiC) sensors, not as a replacement for blades, but as a matrix of photoconductive elements, positioned directly after the synchrotron source, each capable of separately detecting BM and ID radiation. Initial tests show sub-micron sensitivity and clear separation of beam contributions, offering a new way forward.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Colja et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd26642b1836717e1d99https://doi.org/10.18429/jacow-ibic2025-wepmo17
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Testing of SiC Blade X-ray Beam Position Monitors for Synchrotron Front-Ends2026
  2. 2SiC resistive X-ray beam monitor for intensity and position control of synchrotron light2026
  3. 3Development of Novel, Radiation-Hard, Ultra-Compact Active Beamstops with Integrated 4-Quadrant X-ray Sensors for Scattering Experiments on High-Brilliance Undulator Beamlines2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Development of a real-time beam profile monitor for GeV photons and its application in accelerator facilities2024
  5. 5Sub-micron ultra thin SiC free standing membranes for soft X-rays beam monitoring2026 · 2 citations