PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Systems2 citationsOpen Access

Modeling China’s Urban Network Structure: Unraveling the Drivers from a Population Mobility Perspective

View Full Paper
HDHaowei DuanKLKai Liu

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how intercity population flows shape urban networks in China and identify the underlying drivers.
  • Utilized Amap Migration Data from 2018 to 2023 to map urban networks.
  • Applied social network analysis to evaluate network properties.
  • Employed a temporal exponential random graph model to identify key drivers.
  • Investigated the core-periphery dynamic within individual city networks.
  • Identified a high connectivity and strong clustering trait in the overall urban network.
  • Revealed a diamond-shaped core-periphery structure dominated by hub cities.
  • Demonstrated that strategic corridors allow peripheral cities to develop into secondary hubs.
  • Highlighted nonlinear interactions as driving factors in the urban network's evolution.

Abstract

Intercity population flows are playing an increasingly pivotal role in shaping the spatial evolution and structural dynamics of urban networks. Drawing upon Amap Migration Data (2018–2023), this study maps China’s urban networks using social network analysis and identifies their key drivers using a temporal exponential random graph model. The findings reveal three primary insights: First, the overall network exhibits “high connectivity and strong clustering” traits. Enhanced efficiency in intercity resource allocation fosters cross-regional factor flows, resulting in multi-tiered connectivity corridors. Industrial linkages and policy interventions drive the development of a polycentric and clustered configuration. Second, the individual city network exhibits a core–periphery dynamic structure. A diamond-shaped framework dominated by hub cities in the national strategic regions directs factor flows. Development of strategic corridors enables peripheral cities to evolve into secondary hubs by leveraging structural hole advantages, reflecting the continuous interplay between network structure and geo-economic factors. Third, driving factors involve nonlinear interactions within a multi-layered system. Path dependence in topology, gradient potential from nodal attributes, spatial counterbalance between geographic decay laws and multidimensional proximity, and adaptive self-organization are collectively associated with the transition of the urban network toward a multi-tiered synergistic pattern. By revealing the dynamic interplay between network topology and multidimensional driving factors, this study deepens and advances the theoretical connotations of the “Space of Flows” theory, providing an empirical foundation for optimizing regional governance strategies and promoting high-quality coordinated development of Chinese cities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd4c642b1836717e2048https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Concentration Patterns and Driving Factors of Urban Population Mobility in China2026
  2. 2The Structural and Functional Development of an Urban Network System from the Perspective of Flow Space: A Case Study of Nanjing2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Modeling interprovincial migration in China using dual mechanism ERGM: toward resilient and sustainable mobility2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Spatial Analysis of Intercity Migration Patterns of China’s Rural Population: Based on the Network Perspective2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Driving Mechanisms of Structural Evolution in Intercity Tourism Information Flow Networks: An Endogenous–Exogenous Perspective2026