PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism0 citations

Cardiovascular outcomes under hypothetical blood‐pressure‐lowering intervention in type 2 diabetes: A target trial emulation

View Full Paper
XTXue TianSWShouling WuXXXue Xia

Key Result

Maintaining systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤120 mmHg in type 2 diabetes increased the risk of all-cause mortality by 15% (RR 1.15) and was associated with more harms than benefits.

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effects of maintaining systolic blood pressure below clinical thresholds on cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes.
  • Included 4264 patients with type 2 diabetes from the Kailaun study.
  • Used parametric g-formula to simulate blood pressure interventions below 140, 130, and 120 mmHg.
  • Analyzed the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality with risk ratios and number needed to treat.
  • Maintaining SBP below 140, 130, and 120 mmHg reduced cardiovascular disease risk by 18%, 24%, and 31%, respectively.
  • The number needed to treat for 10 years was 32, 24, and 19 for the different SBP targets, respectively.
  • SBP below 120 mmHg increased the risk of all-cause mortality by 15%, indicating potential harm, especially in older patients or those not on antihypertensives.

Structured PICO

Does maintaining SBP below 140, 130, or 120 mmHg reduce the 10-year risk of CVD and all-cause mortality in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes?

P
Population
4,264 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes from the Kailuan study
I
Intervention
Hypothetical interventions reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 140, 130, and 120 mmHg over time
C
Comparator
No intervention
O
Outcome
10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortalityhard clinical

In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, targeting an SBP ≤120 mmHg reduces CVD risk but may increase all-cause mortality, suggesting it is not an optimal target.

Abstract

Abstract Aims The effective target for systolic blood pressure (SBP) control in patients with diabetes was inconsistent. We evaluated the emulated effect of maintaining SBP below clinical thresholds on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all‐cause mortality. Materials and Methods This study included 4264 patients with type 2 diabetes from the Kailaun study. We implemented the parametric g‐formula to simulate the hypothetical interventions on reducing SBP below 140, 130 and 120 mmHg over time, accounting for time‐varying confounding, reporting risk ratio (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT) for 10‐year risk of CVD and all‐cause mortality. Results Maintaining SBP below 140, 130 and 120 mmHg was associated with an 18%, 24%, and 31% relative risk reduction in the risk of CVD, with the RR (95% confidence interval CI) of 0.82 (0.75–0.88), 0.76 (0.69–0.86), and 0.69 (0.58–0.84), and the NNT of 32, 24, and 19, respectively, compared to no intervention. However, the benefits in reducing the risk of all‐cause mortality did not reach a significant level with maintaining SBP below 140 and 130 mmHg, with the RR (95% CI) of 0.98 (0.93–1.06) and 1.04 (0.95–1.12), respectively. The risk of all‐cause mortality significantly increased 15% with maintaining SBP ≤120 mmHg (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02–1.32). Subgroup analyses showed that maintaining SBP ≤120 mmHg tended to bring more harms than benefits in patients aged ≥60 years or without antihypertensive agents. Conclusion Among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, maintaining SBP ≤120 mmHg may not be an optimal target, in terms of the risk–benefit association of CVD and all‐cause mortality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tian et al. (2026) studied this question. Maintaining systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤120 mmHg in type 2 diabetes increased the risk of all-cause mortality by 15% (RR 1.15) and was associated with more harms than benefits.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd6a642b1836717e2289https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70472
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper