PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology3 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Subepidermal Low‐Echogenic Band via High‐Frequency Ultrasound for Evaluating the Efficacy of Platelet‐Rich Plasma Injection in Treating Facial Skin Photoaging: A Case Series

View Full Paper
WYWenjue YeTLTong LiuWZWei Zhang

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma injections for facial photoaging by measuring changes in subepidermal low-echogenic band and dermal thickness using high-frequency ultrasound.
  • Retrospective case series of 10 patients with Glogau I–III photoaging
  • Three monthly injections of platelet-rich plasma following a dual-step protocol
  • Measurements of SLEB width and dermal thickness at four facial sites before and after treatment using high-frequency ultrasound
  • Skin parameters assessed via skin analyzer
  • Clinical evaluations using Glogau classification and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for efficacy and patient satisfaction
  • SLEB width significantly decreased by an average of 29%–47% after treatment (p < 0.001)
  • Dermal thickness increased by an average of 24%–51% (p ≤ 0.003)
  • Skin analyzer showed significant improvements in pores, wrinkles, brown spots, and red areas (p < 0.05)
  • Clinical evaluations demonstrated improvement in Glogau classification (p < 0.01) and 100% patient satisfaction on GAIS
  • Only minor side effects, such as transient erythema and mild pain, were reported

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Facial skin photoaging manifests as wrinkles, laxity, roughness, enlarged pores, telangiectasia, pigmentation, and dermal structural changes. Histologically, dermal collagen degradation and dermal‐epidermal junction disruption form the subepidermal low‐echogenic band (SLEB) on ultrasound. Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) injection promotes skin regeneration but lacks objective imaging biomarkers. Objective To objectively evaluate the structural efficacy of PRP for facial photoaging by quantifying SLEB width and dermal thickness changes via high‐frequency ultrasound (HFUS), alongside skin analyzer assessments. Methods This retrospective case series included 10 patients (Glogau I–III) receiving three monthly PRP injections. The treatment utilized a standardized dual‐step protocol: manual precision injection targeting the deep dermis, followed by mechanical mesogun injection for uniform superficial coverage. SLEB width and dermal thickness were measured at four facial sites using HFUS before and 1 month after treatment. A skin analyzer assessed skin parameters. A comprehensive clinical evaluation was conducted using the Glogau classification and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) for efficacy and patient satisfaction assessment. Results Post‐treatment, HFUS revealed significant reductions in SLEB width (average decrease 29%–47%, all p < 0.001) and increases in dermal thickness (average increase 24%–51%, all p ≤ 0.003). Skin analyzer showed significant improvements in Pores, Wrinkles, Brown Spots, and Red Areas (all p < 0.05). Clinical evaluations confirmed significant improvement in Glogau classification ( p < 0.01) and high patient satisfaction (100% reported improvement on GAIS). No serious adverse events were observed; only transient erythema/edema and mild pain were reported. Conclusion HFUS is a reliable, non‐invasive tool for assessing PRP efficacy. SLEB width reduction serves as a sensitive, objective imaging biomarker, providing structural evidence for PRP's ability to improve photoaging damage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ye et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd90642b1836717e23abhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70684
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper