PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Public Personnel Management0 citations

Perceptions of Political Discrimination and Political Activity Coercion in the Federal Service

View Full Paper
NENevbahar Ertas

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore perceptions of political discrimination and coercion within the federal service and their effects on employee attitudes.
  • Investigated perceptions of prohibited personnel practices (PPPs) related to partisan politics
  • Analyzed differences across federal agencies and their ethical climates
  • Applied multivariate models to assess impacts on turnover intentions and workplace attitudes
  • Perceptions of political discrimination and coercion are linked to increased turnover intentions among employees
  • Employees are less likely to recommend their agencies as workplaces due to negative perceptions
  • Concerns about partisan politics doubled from 2010 to 2021 among federal workers

Abstract

This study examines perceptions of prohibited personnel practices (PPPs) involving partisan politics in the federal workforce. Among the 18 prohibited practices tracked by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, two—political affiliation discrimination and political activity coercion—doubled in a decade from 2010 to 2021. First, the perceived prevalence of PPPs involving partisan politics is examined by agency and organizational ethical climate. Then, multivariate models are used to investigate whether perceptions of political affiliation discrimination and political activity coercion influence federal employees’ turnover intentions and attitudes toward their agencies as workplaces. The analysis showed that such perceptions negatively affected public servants, making them less likely to recommend their agency as a workplace and more likely to consider leaving their agency. The discussion articulates why partisan politics in civil service is a critical topic for democratic governance and organizational theory in general, and human resource management in particular.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nevbahar Ertas (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdcf642b1836717e26d5https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260251409828
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Examining the Influence of Political Intervention on Recruitment Outcomes in Government Agencies2025
  2. 2Personality Traits and Agency Politicization: Neuroticism and Perceived Political Control in United States Federal Agencies2026
  3. 3When Politics Walk Into Work: Workplace Political Discourse and Organizational Consequences2026
  4. 4Discrimination Is Not OK, but… – When Discrimination Based on Political Orientation Is Considered Legitimate2026
  5. 5Hiring discrimination and stereotyping of political opponents: The intersection of political affiliation and gender2026