PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Drawing cancer chronicles: A qualitative study to evaluate narrative meaning-making over time and in response to a meaning-centred care intervention

View Full Paper
EEEmily R.E. EvansNPNiels van PoeckeMPMaite Portela

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate how individuals with incurable cancer reconstruct their narratives over time in response to a meaning-centred care intervention.
  • Conducted a qualitative analysis using longitudinal visual narratives (Rich Pictures) from participants with incurable cancer.
  • Analyzed data from two groups: one receiving an arts-based intervention and one without.
  • Employed an inductive and participatory analysis approach to compare narratives across time and groups.
  • Identified six narrative strategies used by participants: repeating, retaining, repurposing, reinforcing, reducing, and reassembling.
  • Participants in the arts-based intervention group showed significant development of new narrative strategies relating to their cancer experience.
  • Findings suggest that arts-based interventions aid in narrative reconstruction and meaning-making for individuals facing incurable cancer.

Abstract

The diagnosis of incurable cancer can disrupt life stories, undermining meaning-making and challenging self-identity. People may therefore need to search for and create new stories about their lives that incorporate their diagnosis. Arts-based narrative interventions are being explored to support this existential process of narrative meaning-making. However, developing effective existential support may be limited by the lack of methods capable of investigating their impact. This study is the first to explore narrative meaning-making across time and a meaning-centred care intervention by longitudinally using ‘Rich Pictures’ (RPs) – hand-drawn visual narratives. We analysed repeated RPs about living with incurable cancer from thirty-eight participants in two studies: one incorporating an arts-based narrative intervention, and one without. RPs were compared across time and the two groups using an inductive, multi-level, and participatory analysis approach. Our findings highlighted six strategies variably used by participants to reconstruct their narratives over time: repeating, retaining, repurposing, reinforcing, reducing, and reassembling. Differences were found in the employment of these strategies between the two different studies, with arts-based intervention participants predominantly developing new ways of narrating and relating to cancer as a disruptive life event. We conclude that people living with incurable cancer employ a range of strategies in reconstructing their narratives. Arts-based interventions may support this existential process. The repeated use of RPs is a valuable method for investigating narrative meaning-making over time, across groups, and interventions, offering insights to evaluate and develop meaning-centred care in oncology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Evans et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdcf642b1836717e2705https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341150
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper