PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Computer Science and Information Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Weld proximity defect detection model for steel thin plates based on EP-YOLOv7

View Full Paper
RZRunmei ZhangJFJingwei FanZCZihua Chen

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a model that accurately detects weld proximity defects in steel thin plates using advanced techniques.
  • Developed an industrial detector based on EP-YOLOv7.
  • Introduced Efficient Multiscale Channel Attention (EMCA) for enhanced multi-scale feature perception.
  • Integrated EMCA into Efficient Layer Aggregation Network for improved feature fusion.
  • Designed a Partial-Bottleneck Decoupling Predictor Head (P-BD Head) for better localization of defects.
  • EP-YOLOv7 achieved a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 85.2%/56.2%.
  • F1 scores reached 80.3%/43.3%.
  • Model size increased by only 0.6 MB, totaling 37.9 MB.
  • Significant accuracy improvements were noted while maintaining low computational complexity.

Abstract

Quality inspection of steel plate welding is critical in industrial manufacturing. However, weld proximity defects often present diverse morphologies, overlapping regions, and dense distributions, posing challenges to accurate industrial defect inspection. Therefore, we propose an industrial detector based on the EP-YOLOv7. First, an Efficient Multiscale Channel Attention (EMCA) is introduced to strengthen multi-scale feature perception and improve the model?s focus on weld proximity defects. Second, the EMCA module is integrated into the Efficient Layer Aggregation Network to enhance feature fusion and defect representation. Finally, a Partial-Bottleneck Decoupling Predictor Head (P-BD Head) is designed to significantly improve localization accuracy and reduce missed detections of small targets. Experimental evaluations on both a self-built weld proximity defect dataset and a public generalization dataset show that EP-YOLOv7 achieves mAP of 85.2%/56.2% and F1 scores of 80.3%/43.3%. Meanwhile, the model size increases by only 0.6 MB (total 37.9 MB), demonstrating that the proposed approach delivers substantial accuracy gains while maintaining lightweight computational complexity, suitable for practical industrial applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdcf642b1836717e2850https://doi.org/10.2298/csis250922007z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Weld defect detection based on improved YOLOv8n2026
  2. 2Multi-Type Weld Defect Detection in Galvanized Sheet MIG Welding Using an Improved YOLOv10 Model2026
  3. 3YOLOv8-T: for weld surface defect detection in marine t-profile2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4An improved lightweight YOLOv11 algorithm for weld surface defect detection2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5WeldSimAM and EnNWD Co-Optimization: Enhancing Lightweight YOLOv11 for Multi-Scale Weld Defect Detection2026 · 4 citations