PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Agronomy1 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of Conventional, Reduced Tillage, and No-Till System on Cover Crop Aboveground Biomass

View Full Paper
IRIvana RaimanováPSPavel SvobodaMMMichal Moulik

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how different tillage methods affect the growth and yield of cover crops.
  • Conducted field study at two sites with varying climates from 2021 to 2023
  • Compared three tillage systems: moldboard plow, reduced shallow tillage, and no-till
  • Examined five mixtures of cover crop species for biomass yield
  • Measured aboveground biomass in grams per square meter
  • Assessed differences in growth suppression of volunteer plants across tillage types
  • Conventional tillage significantly increased aboveground biomass compared to reduced tillage and no-till
  • Mustard and oats-vetch mixtures showed less yield loss in reduced tillage than other species
  • Highest yields recorded for mustard, averaging 214.1 g m−2 at Ruzyně
  • Yield differences of over 100% among cover crop variants under the same tillage treatment
  • Reduced tillage resulted in 60-66% of the biomass yield compared to conventional tillage for mustard

Abstract

Tillage after harvesting main crops can affect the growth of subsequent stubble cover crops (CCs). In order to better understand the factors influencing CC performance, the field study took place at two locations—the cooler, wetter Lukavec site and the warm, drier Ruzyně site—from 2021 to 2023. Here, we examined the effects of moldboard plow (PLO), reduced shallow tillage (RET), and no-till (NOT) treatments on five mixtures of two species: buckwheat and mustard or phacelia; oats and vetch; cannabis and setaria; clover and camelina; and two single-species variants, mustard and phacelia. The ADM was significantly higher in all CC variants under PLO (170 and 81.8 g m−2 at Ruzyně and Lukavec, respectively) compared to RET (84.4 and 52.4 g m−2) and NOT (86.3 g m−2). Under the same tillage treatment, the differences in ADM among CC variants were over 100%, with the highest yields being from mustard (averaging 214.1 and 100.6 g m−2 at Ruzyně and Lukavec), oats and vetch (168.6 and 138.2 g m−2), and mustard and buckwheat (138.8 g m−2 at Ruzyně). Cannabis and setaria achieved the lowest yields (28.9 and 14.9 g m−2). No consistent differences were observed between single-species stands and two-species mixtures. The ADM of mustard under RET and NOT reached 66% and 60% of that under PLO, while phacelia and phacelia–buckwheat achieved between 17 and 44% of the same variable at Ruzyně. Better shoot growth significantly suppressed the growth of volunteer plants from previous cereal crops across all tillage types and at both sites. The study demonstrated that, despite differences in soil and climatic conditions, the aboveground yield of stubble cover crops was lower under reduced-tillage or no-till systems than under conventional tillage. Mustard, alone or mixed with buckwheat, and a mixture of oats and vetch responded to reduced tillage with less yield loss than the other species and mixtures. This results will aid in choosing suitable cover crop species for specific site conditions and tillage systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raimanová et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdec642b1836717e28a5https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020234
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper