PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Infection3 citationsOpen Access

Nationwide survey on penicillin allergy delabeling among German healthcare professionals: knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers

View Full Paper
IJInsa JoostLTLukas TomettenJBJoanne Barry

Key Points

  • To assess knowledge, attitudes, and barriers regarding penicillin allergy delabeling among German healthcare professionals.
  • Web-based anonymous survey of physicians and pharmacists in Germany
  • Covered demographics, access to antimicrobial stewardship, allergy assessment, and attitudes towards delabeling
  • Responses analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics
  • 86% were aware of PA delabeling, but only 32% had ever practiced it
  • 12% of physicians regularly took extended allergy histories
  • Only ~30% had access to onsite allergy services
  • Key barriers included lack of time, experience, and clear guidance
  • 88% of physicians and 71% of pharmacists showed interest in delabeling with support

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Penicillin allergy (PA) delabeling optimizes antibiotic prescribing and is a recognized antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) tool. We aimed to characterize current practices and knowledge of PA delabeling in German non-allergist healthcare professionals to define barriers and facilitators for a wider implementation of delabeling strategies. Methods A nationwide web-based, anonymous survey was distributed to physicians and hospital pharmacists. It covered four domains: demographics, access to AMS, allergy assessment and attitude towards PA delabeling. Responses were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results A total of 504 responses (249 physicians, 255 pharmacists) were analysed. While 86% of respondents were familiar with the concept of delabeling, only 32% had ever performed it, mostly fewer than 6 times in the past year. 12% of physicians regularly took extended allergy histories, and just 2% always used a standardized method. Only ~ 30% of respondents had onsite access to allergy services. Barriers included lack of time, experience and guidance. Pharmacists frequently cited PA management as outside their role. Despite limited experience, 88% of physicians and 71% of pharmacists expressed interest in delabeling if supported by clear algorithms and institutional support. Conclusion PA delabeling by non-allergists is of great relevance to physicians and pharmacists in Germany but not routinely integrated in clinical pathways, due to missing guidelines, limited resources and unclear role definitions. However, the results of this study highlight the considerable strong potential for implementing structured delabeling strategies—if they are supported by adequate training, clear protocols and sufficiently resourced antimicrobial stewardship teams.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joost et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdec642b1836717e298dhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-026-02731-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recommendations on how to proceed in case of suspected allergy to penicillin/β-lactam antibiotics. Position paper of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in cooperation with the German Society for Pediatric Allergology (2025 · 13 citations
  2. 2The Prevalence of Suspected and Challenge‐Verified Penicillin Allergy in a University Hospital Population2006 · 138 citations
  3. 3Is This Patient Allergic to Penicillin?2001 · 264 citations
  4. 4Patients with questionable penicillin (beta-lactam) allergy: Causes and solutions2022 · 28 citations
  5. 5Development and Validation of a Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule2020 · 382 citations