PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026PLOS Global Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating the safety of prenatal HIV PrEP use: Perinatal outcomes from three cohort studies in Western Kenya

View Full Paper
BOBen OdhiamboJSJoshua SternJKJ Kinuthia

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the safety of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during pregnancy by evaluating perinatal outcomes.
  • Analyzed data from three cohort studies in Western Kenya
  • Included women ≥ 15 years, HIV-negative, enrolled ≤32 weeks gestation
  • Summarized perinatal outcomes by HIV PrEP exposure and timing of initiation
  • Used Poisson regression models to evaluate associations between outcomes and PrEP exposure
  • No significant differences in overall perinatal outcomes between HIV PrEP-exposed and unexposed pregnancies
  • Lower frequency of low birthweight in HIV PrEP-exposed pregnancies (1.9% vs. 2.5%)
  • Preterm birth was less frequent among those using PrEP during the first trimester and third trimester
  • Findings support guidelines for TDF-based HIV PrEP use in pregnant women

Abstract

Existing data support the safety of daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use in pregnancy, yet ongoing monitoring is needed. We analyzed data from three recently completed HIV PrEP safety and implementation studies (PrIMA, PrIMA-X, and mWACh-PrEP) that enrolled women who were offered and/or initiated TDF-based HIV PrEP at routine health clinics in Western Kenya to summarize perinatal outcomes following HIV PrEP use in pregnancy. Data were included in the analysis from participants who were ≥ 15 years, HIV-negative, enrolled ≤32 weeks gestation and remained pregnant until at least 24 weeks gestation. We summarized the frequency of each pregnancy outcome (stillbirth, preterm birth, low birthweight, neonatal death, congenital anomalies) by study cohort, HIV PrEP exposure status (any vs. none), and timing of first HIV PrEP exposure (first, second, or third trimester). Poisson regression models were used to assess associations between adverse outcomes and HIV PrEP exposure timing and duration, adjusting for maternal age, primigravity, and clustering by study cohort. A total of N = 4389 women were included in the analysis (29.8% with HIV PrEP exposure). The median age was 24.1 years, and median gestational age at enrollment was 24 weeks. Most women (83.4%) were married and 39.4% had a partner of unknown HIV status. Among HIV PrEP-exposed pregnancies ( n = 1310), most initiated HIV PrEP in the second trimester (56.2%). We found no appreciable differences in perinatal outcomes between pregnancies with and without any HIV PrEP exposure, though HIV PrEP-exposed pregnancies had lower frequency of low birthweight (1.9% vs. 2.5%, adjusted prevalence ratio aPR=0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97). Among pregnancies with any HIV PrEP exposure, preterm birth was less frequent among those with any PrEP use in the first trimester (aPR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.57) and third-trimester (aPR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.88), compared to those with no PrEP use in those trimesters; low birth weight was also less frequent among in pregnancies with third-trimester HIV PrEP initiation compared to second trimester initiation (aPR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.88). All other perinatal outcomes were comparable by timing of HIV PrEP exposure. These findings support current guidelines recommending daily oral TDF-based HIV PrEP for pregnant and lactating women at risk of HIV.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Odhiambo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdec642b1836717e298fhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005744
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper