PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Impact of intraprocedural antiplatelet therapy on stent patency and safety after emergent intracranial stenting in acute ischaemic stroke: insights from the RESISTANT registry

View Full Paper
FDFrancesco DianaAHAmeer E HassanSOSantiago Ortega-Gutierrez

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of various intraprocedural antiplatelet therapy regimens during emergent intracranial stenting for acute ischaemic stroke.
  • Subanalysis of the RESISTANT registry of patients treated with emergent intracranial stenting.
  • Patients receiving intraprocedural antithrombotics were included.
  • Primary outcomes were stent patency and mRS at 3 months; secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage.
  • Multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses were performed.
  • Among 827 patients, four antiplatelet strategies were identified: single APT, oral dual APT, Cangrelor, and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
  • Intravenous agents showed a trend toward lower risk of occlusion compared to oral dAPT, with odds ratios suggesting improved outcomes.
  • GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors indicated lower risk of stent occlusion at 24 hours without increased symptomatic haemorrhage.
  • Both intravenous agents associated with higher odds of successful reperfusion, but no significant difference in functional outcomes between APT strategies.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Emergent intracranial stenting (EIS) is increasingly employed in the context of the acute ischaemic stroke treatment, but requires intraprocedural antiplatelet therapy (APT), which may raise haemorrhagic risk. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of different APT regimens during EIS. Patients and methods This is a subanalysis of the RESISTANT registry, which is a multicenter retrospective registry of patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated with intracranial EIS between 2016 and 2023. Patients receiving intraprocedural antithrombotics were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were stent patency (intraprocedural and within 24 hours) and 3-month mRS. Secondary outcome was successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥ 2b), and the safety outcome was sICH. Multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Results Among 827 patients, 4 APT strategies were identified: single APT (n = 102), oral dual antiplatelet therapy (dAPT) (Aspirin + Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor; n = 83), Cangrelor (n = 92) and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPi) (n = 550). Intravenous agents (Cangrelor/GPi) showed a trend towards lower risk of intraprocedural stent occlusion compared to oral dAPT (adjusted odds ratio aOR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.09–1.01, P = .053), though this did not reach statistical significance. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors continued to demonstrate a protective trend at 24 hours (aOR 0.25, 95% CI, 0.06–0.99, P = .047), without a significant increase in sICH. Both intravenous agents were independently associated with higher odds of successful final reperfusion (odds ratio OR 4.35, 95% CI, 1.57–12.09, P = .001). No significant differences emerged between GPi and Cangrelor in matched analysis. No significant difference was observed on good functional outcome between APT strategies. Conclusion In the setting of EIS, intravenous APT agents (Cangrelor or GPi) were associated with improved stent patency and higher rates of successful reperfusion, without a significant increase in symptomatic haemorrhage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diana et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bdec642b1836717e2992https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakaf005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper