PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

"Review of Wordplay: Matthais Buchinger's Drawings from the Collection of Ricky Jay (New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 8 January – 11 April 2016)," Renaissance Studies 31:5 (November)

View Full Paper
SMSimon Mittman

Key Points

  • The review aims to explore the cultural significance of non-normative bodies as depicted in Matthias Buchinger's drawings and their relation to historical sideshows.
  • Analysis of drawings from the collection of Ricky Jay
  • Examination of historical contexts of sideshows and display of non-normative bodies
  • Review of literature on cultural interpretations of monstrosity
  • Highlighting the changing perceptions of monsters from divine judgment to natural wonder
  • Documenting the historical fascination with non-normative bodies during the Early Modern period
  • Identifying venues that showcased individuals with unusual abilities or appearances

Abstract

Wordplay: Matthias Buchinger's Drawings from the Collection of Ricky Jay (New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 8 January-11 April 2016). Exhibition publication Ricky Jay, Matthias Buchinger: 'The Greatest German Living. Los Angeles: Siglio, 2016. 160pp, colour illustrations, 39. 95, ISBN 978-1-938221-12-5. A few weeks ago, I visited the famous Coney Island Circus Sideshow for the first time. It was a weekday afternoon, and there were only a handful of visitors in attendance, but they were enthusiastic. Ray Valenz served as the master of ceremonies, as well as the main performer. He was the Human Blockhead, and hammered nails into his face with a casual sangfroid. He sat an audience member (who admitted to having heart problems) on an 'electric chair', and lit lightbulbs and then torches off her tongue; he ate some fire. Valenz introduced Betty Bloomerz as his sister, though her bio tells us that she 'arrived in Coney Island blindfolded and bound, suspended upside down, carried by a giant stork with a plastic for an eyepatch'. ' She swallowed swords with admirable élan, and then served as the Human Pincushion. There was a yo-yo master. The show was lively and enjoyable, though not quite thrilling, perhaps in part because al of the performers were, in essence, normative in their bodies, though they used them in unusual and impressive ways. The heyday of the sideshow is now long past, though there are still a few performers at the Sideshow who appear under the banner of 'human oddity? As Katharine Park and Lorraine J. Daston have chronicled, the Early Modern period was an era of great fascination with the same sorts of wonders that would come to be known as sideshow freaks. 'Monsters were in great vogue' and 'appeared in almost every forum of discussion in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. " While monsters and prodigies had been of interest since the ancient period, as Daston and Park note, there has been some change in cultural interpretations of these phenomena. After 1500, there is less focus on divine judgment, and more on the wonder of nature, as wel as a general loosening of the boundaries between various conceptual categories (such as prodigy, deformity, monster). There was also an increase in the display of non-normative bodies for the interest and amusement of the public. * Such displays occurred at large fairs and festivals, but also in small, informal venues like pubs and cafés. " From 1133 to 1855, the Bartholomew Fair ran in West Smithfield, London, and from the Early Modem period through the start of the nineteenth century, housed what William Wordsworth called a 'Parliament of monsters'? Non-normative bodies were also a subject of study among academics: the Royal Society held many meetings dedicated to various 'monstrous births' such as 'children born without brains (1697, 1711), various dwarfs and 'gigantic' children (1744, 1746, 1750, 1751) ', and so on. Indeed, the Society kept a cabinet of curiosities through the late eighteenth century. '

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Simon Mittman (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971be10642b1836717e2ba0https://doi.org/10.17613/yfz39-nk621
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1At-Home Humbugs: Freaks and Fakes in the Nineteenth-Century Parlor Museum2022
  2. 2The Monster of Ravenna and Other Imaginations: Animal Symbols, Birth Defects, and Political Agendas in the Conceptualization of Monstrosities from Medieval Witchcraft Lore to Early Modern Europe, with Some Repercussions in the 19th Century and Beyond2025
  3. 3The Miraculous and the Monstrous in the Discourse on Nature of the XVII Century2025
  4. 4Warnings out of Germany: reinventing continental prodigies for the English press, 1618-16382026
  5. 5Beastly Ambiguity: Monkey Theater in Paris, 1600–17892026