PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Radiative Cooling Techniques for Efficient Urban Lighting and IoT Energy Harvesting

View Full Paper
ESEdgar SaavedraUniversidad Politécnica de MadridGCGuillermo del CampoIGIgnacio GómezUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid

Key Points

  • This work aims to evaluate the effectiveness of radiative cooling techniques in urban lighting and energy harvesting systems.
  • Conducted outdoor measurements with LED luminaires and energy-harvesting modules under realistic conditions.
  • Compared multiple configurations of RC films and CPC optics on LED luminaires.
  • Monitored surface temperatures and open-circuit voltages of PV and TE modules in varying settings.
  • RC consistently reduced device temperatures by a few degrees Celsius relative to a reference configuration.
  • Higher irradiance conditions led to larger temperature reductions.
  • PV and TE modules showed small but measurable increases in open-circuit voltage due to thermal differences.
  • CPCs preserved or slightly enhanced the cooling effect without being primary contributors.

Abstract

This work presents an experimental assessment of radiative cooling (RC) films and compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) optics integrated into systems relevant for smart cities: LED street luminaires and small photovoltaic (PV) and thermoelectric (TE) modules used as energy-harvesting (EH) sources for IoT devices. Using commercial RC film and simple 2D/3D CPC geometries, we conducted outdoor measurements under realistic conditions. For a commercial LED luminaire, several configurations were compared (painted aluminum reference, full RC coverage of the head, partial RC strips above the LED and driver, and RC combined with CPCs), recording surface temperatures during daytime and nighttime operation. In parallel, single-junction PV cells and Peltier-type TE generators were mounted on aluminum plates in three configurations: reference, RC-coated, RC + 3D-CPC. Their surface temperatures and open-circuit (OC) voltages were monitored in daylight. Across all campaigns, RC consistently reduced device or surface temperatures by a few degrees Celsius compared to the reference, with larger reductions under higher irradiance. For PV and TE modules, thermal differences produced small but measurable increases in OC voltage—percent-level for PV, millivolt-level for TE. CPCs generally preserved or slightly enhanced the cooling effect in some configurations, acting as incremental modifiers rather than primary drivers. The experiments are deliberately exploratory and provide initial experimental evidence that RC integration can be beneficial in real devices. They establish an empirical baseline for future work on long-term, multi-season campaigns, electrical characterization, optimized materials/optics, and system-level prototypes in smart-city lighting and IoT EH applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saavedra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971be6b642b1836717e30bchttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16021015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper