PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026NMR in Biomedicine0 citations

A Comprehensive Framework for Uncertainty Quantification of Voxel‐Wise Supervised Deep Learning Models in IVIM MRI

View Full Paper
NCNicola CasaliABAlessandro BrusaferriGBGiuseppe Baselli

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a framework for uncertainty quantification in IVIM MRI using advanced deep learning techniques.
  • Proposed a probabilistic framework using deep ensembles (DEs) and mixture density networks (MDNs).
  • Conducted supervised training on synthetic data and evaluated on simulated and in vivo datasets.
  • Assessed reliability using calibration curves, output distribution sharpness, and continuous ranked probability score (CRPS).
  • MDNs yielded more calibrated predictive distributions for diffusion coefficient and perfusion fraction parameters.
  • Observed slight overconfidence in the estimates of the pseudodiffusion coefficient.
  • Robust coefficient of variation indicated smoother in vivo estimates with MDNs compared to Gaussian models.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate estimation of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters from diffusion‐weighted MRI remains challenging due to the ill‐posed nature of the inverse problem and high sensitivity to noise, particularly in the perfusion compartment. In this work, we propose a probabilistic deep learning framework based on deep ensembles (DEs) of mixture density networks (MDNs), enabling estimation of total predictive uncertainty and decomposition into aleatoric (AU) and epistemic (EU) components. The method was benchmarked against nonprobabilistic neural networks, a Bayesian fitting approach, and a probabilistic network with single Gaussian parametrization. Supervised training was performed on synthetic data, and evaluation was conducted on both simulated and in vivo brain mouse dataset. The reliability of the quantified uncertainties was assessed using calibration curves, output distribution sharpness, and the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). MDNs produced more calibrated and sharper predictive distributions for the diffusion coefficient () and the perfusion fraction () parameters, although slight overconfidence was observed in the pseudodiffusion coefficient (). The robust coefficient of variation (RCV) indicated smoother in vivo estimates for with MDNs compared with Gaussian model. Despite the training data covering the expected physiological range, elevated EU in vivo suggests a mismatch with real acquisition conditions, highlighting the importance of incorporating EU, which was allowed by DE. Overall, we present a comprehensive framework for IVIM fitting with uncertainty quantification, which enables the identification and interpretation of unreliable estimates. The proposed approach can also be adopted for fitting other physical models through appropriate architectural and simulation adjustments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Casali et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971be6b642b1836717e31e8https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70227
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper