PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026JMIR Research Protocols0 citationsOpen Access

Quality in Use in Connected Mental Health: Protocol for a Systematic Mapping Study

View Full Paper
SPShweta PremanandanSOSofia OuhbiMSMagdalena Stadin

Key Points

  • This study aims to systematically map and synthesize research on quality in use within connected mental health applications.
  • Utilizing a systematic mapping methodology as per established guidelines.
  • Defining mapping questions and developing a classification scheme.
  • Conducting a literature search across multiple databases including Scopus and PubMed.
  • Analyzing peer-reviewed literature focusing on quality in use characteristics and technologies.
  • Results are not yet available as the mapping study is ongoing.
  • Preliminary findings indicate variability in definitions and evaluations of quality in use across connected mental health technologies.

Abstract

Background Quality in use (QiU), a stakeholder-centered dimension of software quality encompassing effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and freedom from risk, is essential in evaluating digital systems, particularly in health-related domains. Although QiU has been explored in various fields, its application within connected mental health (CMH) systems remains fragmented and understudied. Given the rapid rise in CMH technologies, ranging from mobile apps to teletherapy platforms, understanding how QiU is conceptualized, evaluated, and reported in this domain has become increasingly urgent. Objective This study aims to systematically map and synthesize existing research on QiU in CMH applications. It seeks to identify current trends, research gaps, evaluation methods, and the range of technologies examined concerning QiU. Methods A systematic mapping methodology following the guidelines by Petersen et al will be used. The process includes defining mapping questions, developing a classification scheme, and systematically searching and analyzing peer-reviewed literature from databases—Scopus, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. Eight mapping questions will guide the analysis, focusing on publication trends, research types, empirical evaluations, QiU characteristics and subcharacteristics, and technologies studied. Results As this paper presents the protocol for an ongoing mapping study, results are not yet available. The literature search and data analysis are scheduled for completion in 2026. Preliminary screening suggests variability in how QiU is defined and evaluated across CMH technologies, highlighting the need for systematic synthesis. Conclusions This systematic mapping study will fill a critical gap by providing a comprehensive overview of QiU research in the context of CMH. By organizing and classifying the existing literature, the study will inform future research, support the development of more user-centered CMH tools, and contribute to establishing more consistent evaluation practices in this growing field. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/79611

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Premanandan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971be8d642b1836717e3236https://doi.org/10.2196/79611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 103,986 citations
  2. 2Designing and Evaluating IT Applications for Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review2024 · 16 citations
  3. 3Biofeedback-Based Connected Mental Health Interventions for Anxiety: Systematic Literature Review2021 · 80 citations
  4. 4Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications2012 · 926 citations
  5. 5Digital technology to support mental health: a brief introduction to what it is and why it is important?2022 · 6 citations