PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery0 citations

A critical appraisal of qualitative research exploring the lived experience following total laryngectomy

View Full Paper
LWLaurie A. WatsonLHLisa Houghton

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore and articulate the lived experiences of individuals following total laryngectomy.
  • Reviewed eleven qualitative articles on post-laryngectomy experiences.
  • Identified and analyzed inter-related themes relevant to psychosocial and communicative challenges.
  • Discussed implications for transitioning care models from medical to biopsychosocial.
  • Identified three main themes reflecting the lived experiences of individuals post-laryngectomy.
  • Advocated for a shift in long-term care from a medical model to a biopsychosocial approach.
  • Suggested further research to encompass a wider range of demographics.

Abstract

Purpose of review Laryngectomy is a life-changing operation; however, little attention has been paid to exploring peoples lived experiences. Understanding these experiences is critical, particularly in relation to the psychosocial, communicative, and rehabilitative challenges that follow surgery. Recent findings Critical appraisal and author discussion of eleven articles generated three inter-related themes: Summary Critical appraisal of the literature has provided a unique insight into the lived experience of people after laryngectomy. This literature review advocates the importance of transitioning long-term laryngectomy care away from a sole medical model to one that incorporates a biopsychosocial model of care. It would be beneficial for future work to explore a wider demographic of people with a laryngectomy. For example, a more diverse range of experiences across age, gender, ethnicity and socio-economic status. This would ensure that the needs of local populations are met within their local communities, consistent with principles of accessibility, equity and person-centred care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Watson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bea8642b1836717e34aahttps://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0000000000001109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1‘We Needed a Hell of a Lot More Support, the Emotional Side of It, the Physical Side of It. Every Side of It, We Just Didn't get It.’ A Qualitative Study Exploring the Lived Experiences of Healthcare Services Following Discharge for People With a Total Laryngectomy and Their Families2026
  2. 2Navigating life after laryngectomy: a qualitative study on adjustment and distress in the first 6 months following surgery2026
  3. 3Quality of life after total laryngectomy: a retrospective study2025
  4. 4Exploring the Laryngectomy Pathway Experience—a Mixed‐Method, Patient Journey Mapping Study of Two US Health Centres2026
  5. 5CURRENT ATTITUDES OF LARYNGECTOMY PATIENTS*†1979