PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced and Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma: Doxorubicin vs. Gemcitabine—A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
IKIlma KhanPAPriyal AgarwalNANassar El Assaad

Key Points

  • This review aims to determine the effectiveness of first-line chemotherapy regimens, focusing on doxorubicin and gemcitabine for treating advanced leiomyosarcoma.
  • Conducted a systematic search in medical databases like MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library.
  • Included studies must report on first-line chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma with at least 10 patients.
  • Reviewed a total of 11 studies, incorporating data from 1225 patients.
  • Doxorubicin-based combinations showed higher objective response rates and overall survival compared to gemcitabine-based regimens.
  • The LMS04 trial reported a median progression-free survival of 12 months and overall survival of 33 months with doxorubicin plus trabectedin.
  • Doxorubicin regimens, while more effective, had the highest rates of severe toxicity.

Abstract

Background: Leiomyosarcomas are an aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma that arise from smooth muscle, have a high metastatic potential and account for 10–20% of soft-tissue sarcomas. Despite decades of research, the first-line treatment remains unresolved due to the absence of direct comparative trials, heterogeneous study designs, and trade-offs between efficacy and toxicity. This systematic review evaluates the optimal therapeutic systemic chemotherapy regimens in the first-line setting, specifically gemcitabine- and doxorubicin-based regimens, including associated toxicities. Methods: A systematic search in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) identified studies of first-line gemcitabine- or doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for leiomyosarcoma. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261280028). Of the 3092 articles screened, 11 articles were eligible for inclusion, comprising results from 1225 patients. Eligible studies were in English and included ≥10 patients with advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma reporting on LMS-specific outcomes and no prior systemic therapy. This qualitative systematic review synthesizes prospective and retrospective evidence without quantitative meta-analysis. Results: The review included two phase 3 trials, six phase 2 trials, one phase 1b trial, and two retrospective studies. While there was no direct comparison in this setting, doxorubicin-based combinations consistently reported higher objective response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The most favorable outcomes were observed in the LMS04 trial with doxorubicin plus trabectedin followed by surgery and trabectedin maintenance, yielding a median progression-free survival of 12 months, overall survival of 33 months, and objective response rate of 36%. This regimen also had the highest grade 3–4 toxicity. Conclusions: Doxorubicin-based regimens remain the most active first-line option for leiomyosarcoma, although treatment practices remain heterogeneous.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730eabc8125b09b0d1e85bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020335
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper