PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Economies0 citationsOpen Access

Integration into Global Value Chains: Evidence from Mexico, 1995–2020

View Full Paper
LRLuisa Rivera-BasquesMHMaría Fernanda Higuera-Cota

Key Points

  • This paper aims to analyze Mexico's integration into global value chains and its implications for structural change from 1995 to 2020.
  • Utilized a multiregional input-output framework to analyze gross exports
  • Decomposed exports into domestic and foreign value added
  • Assessed forward and backward production linkages
  • Examined sectoral GVC participation patterns and domestic production structure
  • Strong and persistent backward participation indicating high dependence on imported inputs
  • Comparatively lower forward participation with stable involvement
  • Significant contribution of the automotive sector to domestic value added
  • Limited number of sectors showed upgrading, with high persistence in sectoral roles

Abstract

This paper examines Mexico’s integration into Global Value Chains (GVCs) and its implications for structural change over the period 1995–2020. Using a multiregional input–output framework, the analysis decomposes gross exports into domestic and foreign value added and combines these indicators with weighted forward and backward production linkages to assess the relationship between sectoral GVC participation patterns and sectors’ roles within the domestic production structure. The results show that Mexico’s integration into GVCs has been characterized by strong and persistent backward participation, reflecting a high dependence on imported intermediate inputs, alongside comparatively lower and more stable forward participation. Multi-stage integration has been particularly relevant in a limited number of manufacturing activities—most notably in the automotive sector—both in terms of its contribution to domestic value added and its dynamism. However, this form of integration has remained highly concentrated, and changes in sectoral GVC participation have not translated into generalized shifts in the dynamic hierarchy of sectors. Sectoral roles within the production structure exhibit a high degree of persistence over time, with only a small number of nongeneralized cases of upgrading. By jointly examining GVC participation typologies and sectoral linkage dynamics, the paper contributes to bridging trade-in-value-added analyses and structuralist approaches to productive change. From a policy perspective, while the results do not establish causal relationships, they point to differentiated structural patterns with relevant implications for industrial policy. Overall, the analysis suggests that deeper integration into GVCs, in the absence of targeted industrial policies, does not by itself guarantee structural transformation or sustained gains in domestic value added.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rivera-Basques et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f34c8125b09b0d1effchttps://doi.org/10.3390/economies14010030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper