PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026British Journal of Occupational Therapy0 citations

Assessment and intervention of the upper limb in children and adolescents with unilateral cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study

View Full Paper
IHIria Hidalgo-ArcosPJPatricia Jovellar-Isiegas

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how Spanish occupational therapists assess and treat upper limb function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP).
  • Distributed an online survey to occupational therapists working with pediatric neurological conditions in Spain.
  • Questionnaire included 32 items focused on demographics, assessments, and interventions.
  • Analyzed responses from 130 therapists regarding their practices with UCP.
  • 57.7% of therapists used standardised assessment tools; only 17.7% knew their validation status.
  • 32.3% of therapists assessed somatosensory processing in cases of UCP.
  • 30.77% implemented intensive therapies, but only 12.5% followed recommended dosage guidelines.

Abstract

Introduction: Occupational therapy aims to support children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) by enhancing upper limb (UL) function and promoting participation. Although evidence strongly endorses specific assessment tools and interventions, their consistent application in clinical settings remains unclear. Aim: This study explored the clinical practices of Spanish occupational therapists in assessing and treating children with UCP, focusing on UL function, participation and somatosensory processing. Method: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to occupational therapists working with paediatric neurological conditions in Spain. The questionnaire comprised 32 items across three domains: demographics, assessment and intervention. Findings: Of the 130 respondents, 57.7% used standardised assessment tools, yet only 17.7% were aware of their validation status. Somatosensory processing was assessed in fewer than half of the cases by 32.3% of therapists. Intensive therapies were employed by 30.77%, with only 12.5% adhering to recommended dosage guidelines. Common conventional approaches included bimanual activities, play, activities of daily living re-education, somatosensory stimulation, adaptations and assistive devices. Some therapists also incorporated emerging therapies. Conclusion: The findings reveal a gap between evidence-based recommendations and clinical practice, particularly regarding somatosensory assessment and intensive interventions. Enhanced professional development is needed to support the consistent use of validated tools and structured strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hidalgo-Arcos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f59c8125b09b0d1f1b2https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226251412246
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper