PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Journal of Crohn s and Colitis0 citations

P0750Therapy courses of advanced therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): results from the TARGET register for patients with IBD in Germany

View Full Paper
SPS Plachta-DanielzikEGE GilmanPEPhilipp Efken

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate treatment persistence and switching patterns among IBD patients receiving advanced therapies.
  • Data collection via the TARGET registry, a multicenter, non-interventional cohort study.
  • Included 1764 IBD patients from Germany, collecting data every 6 months.
  • Used Kaplan-Meier analysis to assess treatment persistence over 10 years.
  • Applied Chi2-test to compare persistence rates across different therapeutic groups.
  • 2001 therapy courses were analyzed, with significant discrepancies in therapy switches between advanced therapies.
  • Treatment persistence rates after 10 years ranged from 83% to 93% across different therapies.
  • A majority of patients who switched therapies moved from anti-TNF to newer therapies, with 17% remaining within the anti-TNF group.

Abstract

Abstract Background With the approval of numerous new therapies for IBD in recent years, the sequence of treatments has become increasingly relevant. We analysed the course of therapy for IBD patients in the TARGET registry and calculated therapy switches (I) between modes of action (anti-TNF, VDZ, UST, IL-23, JAKi, S1P), (II) within the anti-TNF group, and (III) between biosimilars of IFX, ADA, and UST. Treatment persistence was compared between different modes of action. Methods The TARGET register is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional cohort study collecting data on the effectiveness and safety of advanced therapies (ATs) in IBD patients throughout Germany. Data are collected every 6 months. These analyses examined data from 1764 patients enrolled in the TARGET registry between November 2019 and July 2025, including patients who initiated therapy prior to registry entry. Treatment persistence up to 10 years was analysed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis with log-rank test to compare persistence curves between therapy groups. Chi2-test was used to compare final persistence rates. Results 2001 therapies (1216 in CD, 760 in UC) were available. Significant differences were observed in the proportion of bio-experienced patients ranged from 63–69% for ADA and GOL, and 87–92% for UST, JAKi, and IL-23. Glucocorticoids had been used by 80–100% of patients, and immunosuppressants by approx. 60% prior to registry entry. The proportion of patients who switched therapies ranged from 7-14% (Table 1). Patients treated with anti-TNF and VDZ predominantly switched to established therapies, whereas patients receiving other therapies switched more frequently to newer therapies (Table 1). Within the anti-TNF group, 17% of all switchers remained within the anti-TNF class, while 83% switched mode of action. Among IFX users, 15% patients switched between IFX biosimilars, while 1% switched to a different anti-TNF. In the ADA group, only 2% switched to an ADA biosimilar and 3% switched to IFX. Within the UST group, 2% switched to UST biosimilars. Treatment persistence rates up to 10 years were: 90% for IFX, 87% for ADA, 83% for GOL, 87% for VDZ, 87% for UST, 93% for IL-23, 86% for JAKi, and 89% for S1P. KM analysis revealed significant differences in persistence over the 10-year observation period (p = 0.003) (Figure 1). However, comparison of final persistence rates showed no significant differences between therapies (p = 0.519). Conclusion All patient groups demonstrated high persistence rates. The proportion of patients remaining on therapy ranged from 83% to 93%. KM analysis adjusting for varying follow-up times showed estimated 10-year persistence rates of 65–80% across all therapies. Only minor differences were observed between the groups. Conflict of interest: Dr. Plachta-Danielzik, Sandra: No conflict of interest Gilman, Elena: No conflict of interest Efken, Philipp: PE has received personal fees from: AbbVie, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, and Amgen, outside the submitted work. Holtkamp Endemann, Frank: No conflict of interest von der Ohe, Manfred: No conflict of interest Schubert, Stefan: No conflict of interest Dinter, Johanna: No conflict of interest Jessen, Petra: No conflict of interest Darsow, Christina: No conflict of interest Kahl, Matthias: No conflict of interest Fajardo Salmon, Samantha: No conflict of interest Langness, Sina: No conflict of interest Tappe, Ulrich: UT has served as a consultant for Ferring, Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Falk-Foundation outside the submitted work. Schreiber, Stefan Wolfgang: Personal Fees: AbbVie, Alfasigma, Amgen, Arena, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Falk, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead, IMAB, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Protagonist, Provention Bio, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, Shire, Takeda, Theravance Bokemeyer, Bernd: Grant: Abbvie, Ferring, UCB, Given Imaging, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Galapagos, Lilly Personal Fees: Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Merckle, Falk, HLR, UCB, Shield Therapeutics, Pfizer, Celltrion, Takeda, Janssen, Mundipharma, Arena, Galapagos, BMS, Lilly Other: Abbvie, MSD, Shire, Ferring, Hospira, Takeda, Shield Therapeutics, Pfizer, Biogen, Janssen, Hexal, Cellgene, Boehringer, Allergan, Galapagos, Arena Lilly

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Plachta-Danielzik et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f59c8125b09b0d1f2b1https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf231.931
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1P0633 Prescribing Patterns and Persistence of Advanced Therapies in people with Crohn’s disease with prior advanced therapy: Crohn’s Colitis Cure Data Insights Program2026
  2. 2P0623 Prescribing patterns and persistence of advanced therapies in people with Ulcerative Colitis who are bio-experienced: Insights from the Crohn’s Colitis Care (CCCare) registry2026
  3. 3OP13 Biomarker-informed therapy guidance improved clinical outcomes of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a multi-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label, prospective clinical trial (GUIDE-IBD)2026
  4. 4P1095 Effectiveness of First- and Second-Line Advanced Therapy in Microscopic Colitis: A Real-World Cohort Study2026
  5. 5P1320 Longitudinal metagenomic profiling reveals early microbial changes during infliximab response in IBD.2026