PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Palliative & Supportive Care0 citationsOpen Access

Bridging the language gap in palliative oncology: A translation and validation of the Urdu version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL

View Full Paper
MJM. Abdullah JamilSRSyed Balaj Ali RizviAAAisha Ambreen

Key Points

  • The study aimed to create and validate an Urdu version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire for cancer patients.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center in Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Translated the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL into Urdu with formal approval.
  • Administered both the Urdu QLQ-C15-PAL and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) to patients.
  • Assessed reliability using Cronbach’s alpha and Pearson correlation coefficients for validity.
  • Tested concurrent and known-group validity using ESAS and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS).
  • Included one hundred patients with different cancer types.
  • The overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.86, indicating strong reliability.
  • All subscales, except fatigue (0.697), had alpha >0.8.
  • Convergent validity was shown with correlation coefficients >0.8; weak correlations between unrelated domains indicated discriminant validity.
  • Improved quality of life was noted in patients with high PPS scores (>40).

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) is designed to measure quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients receiving palliative care. The aim of this study was to translate and validate an Urdu version of the questionnaire, which was previously lacking. Methods Following formal approval from the EORTC, the QLQ-C15-PAL was translated into Urdu. Patients admitted under the palliative care service at a tertiary care center in Karachi, Pakistan, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study, and the Urdu QLQ-C15-PAL and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) forms were administered. Performance status was assessed using the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS). Cronbach’s alpha and Pearson correlation coefficients were determined to gauge reliability and validity. Concurrent and known-group validity were tested using ESAS responses and PPS assessments. Results One hundred patients with varying primary cancer sites were included. Cronbach’s alpha for the overall questionnaire was 0.86 and was >0.8 for all subscales except fatigue, where it was 0.697. All correlations to indicate convergent validity had coefficients >0.8 and 87% of correlations between “unrelated” domains were weak, indicating discriminant validity. Known group validity was established and improved QoL was observed in the high PPS (>40) subgroup of patients across multiple domains. However, concurrent validity was not strongly established. Significance of results The Urdu QLQ-C15-PAL is a reliable and valid tool to measure QoL in cancer patients who speak Urdu. However, replication of our results in other settings is warranted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jamil et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f9fc8125b09b0d1f581https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951525101521
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper