PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management0 citations

Earnings Pressure and Environmental Social and Governance Performance: How Executive Compensation Incentives Mitigate Short‐Termism

View Full Paper
JZJunhao ZhongSTSha TangKAKhaldoon Albitar

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how earnings pressure influences ESG performance and the moderating role of executive compensation.
  • Analyzed a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2009 to 2023
  • Examined the relationship between earnings pressure and ESG performance
  • Investigated the moderating effects of equity incentives based on prospect and principal-agent theories
  • Earnings pressure significantly reduces ESG performance
  • Restricted stock mitigates the negative impact of earnings pressure
  • High levels of equity incentives can reverse the adverse effects on ESG performance
  • Underinvestment in ESG weakens competitive advantage and increases management's motives for financial misreporting

Abstract

ABSTRACT The tension between earnings pressure and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance reflects a core conflict in corporate sustainability strategies. However, the role of executive compensation incentives in shaping this relationship remains poorly understood. Guided by prospect theory and principal‐agent theory, we examine how earnings pressure affects ESG performance and how equity incentives moderate this relationship, using a sample of Chinese A‐share listed firms from 2009 to 2023. Our results indicate that: (1) earnings pressure significantly suppresses ESG performance; (2) restricted stock mitigates this negative relationship; when the duration or intensity of equity incentives exceeds specific thresholds, they reverse the negative effect of earnings pressure on ESG performance; (3) ESG underinvestment induced by earnings pressure weakens green competitiveness and prompts long‐term investors to withdraw, and is associated with stronger motivations for management to engage in financial misreporting. These findings offer substantive insights for corporate governance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730fc4c8125b09b0d1f84dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70387
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper