PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Business Strategy and the Environment6 citationsOpen Access

Barriers and Enablers of Circular Economy in Electrical and Electronic Equipment: A Systematic Literature Review

View Full Paper
AAAya AbdelmeguidLCLucia Corsini

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify barriers and enablers for implementing a circular economy in electrical and electronic equipment.
  • Systematic literature review of 161 papers from 2015 to 2024.
  • Thematic coding was applied to categorize findings.
  • Followed PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews.
  • Five key themes emerged: policy and regulation, sustainable design, consumer awareness, infrastructure, and economics.
  • Identified interventions include harmonised extended producer responsibility and design rules for durability.
  • Recommendations for future research include building product-specific evidence and examining trade-offs across the value chain.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rapid technological change, shorter lifecycles and rising demand for electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) are increasing waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) and emphasise the need for a circular economy. This paper identifies barriers and enablers of the circular transition in EEE and outlines interventions. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA), 161 papers (2015–2024) were systematically reviewed and thematically coded. Five themes emerged: policy and regulation, sustainable design, consumer knowledge and awareness, infrastructure and technology and economic and financial factors. Implications include harmonised and eco‐modulated extended producer responsibility (EPR) with value‐retention metrics; right to repair with access to parts and repair information; design rules for durability and disassembly; digital product passports with standardised data; and economic instruments such as reduced VAT and deposit–refunds. Future research should build product‐specific evidence, compare across income contexts and examine tensions and trade‐offs across value chain stages and recovery flows.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdelmeguid et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974602bbb9d90c67120a07ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70559
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper