PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

What Is Not Perverse Publishing?

View Full Paper
ARAndrei Ranete

Key Points

  • The commentary explores biases in academic publishing, particularly among authors and editors, and advocates for transparency as a remedy.
  • Analysis of biases in authorship and editorial review processes.
  • Discussion of the implications of these biases for publishing integrity.
  • Exploration of the concept of transparency in publishing.
  • Identified authors tend to overestimate their work's novelty and importance.
  • Proposed that editors may also introduce additional biases.
  • Emphasized that transparency could help address these issues.

Abstract

That authors are biased toward their own work, overestimating their novelty, importance and correctness, is considered self‑evident. If that is true, on what grounds are editors and potential reviewers assumed to be less biased? Moreover, could they introduce even more bias? Of course. What is the solution? Transparency within publishing... Realistically, these questions and answers should suffice, yet, if I stopped here, most people would not even consider this a "work". Even when problems and solutions are straightforward, the expectation is that especially long‑standing problems require complex and therefore verbose solutions, even though long‑standing problems and their solutions can be simple. What is transparency? If transparency were such an alien concept that it would require clarification, I am inclined to think no explanation could possibly suffice, but I will try anyway.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andrei Ranete (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746149bb9d90c67120b358https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18341142
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper