PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026International Journal of Dentistry0 citationsOpen Access

Experimental Analysis of Automatic Discrimination Performance Between Simulated Bruxism and Non‐Bruxism Under Conscious Conditions Using Electromyography and Machine Learning

View Full Paper
HMHajime MinakuchiMNMitsuhiro NagasakiLĐLộc Hoàng Đình

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate machine learning's ability to classify electromyography (EMG) data into different movement categories related to bruxism.
  • Conducted with twelve healthy participants performing simulated movements.
  • Used EMG data from masseter and other muscles, sampled at specific frequencies.
  • Applied single- and multi-stream hidden Markov models (HMMs) for data classification.
  • Employed a leave-one-out method for training/testing the models on participant data.
  • Masseter EMG showed significantly higher accuracy in the single-stream model (p < 0.05).
  • The multi-stream model also had higher accuracy, but no significant difference was found.
  • Accuracy for bruxism simulated movement without tooth contact (BMwoTC) was below 0.5.

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the potential use of machine learning to automatically classify electromyography (EMG) data into bruxism simulated movement with tooth contact (BMwTC), bruxism simulated movement without tooth contact (BMwoTC), and non‐bruxism movement (non‐BM). Methods Twelve eligible healthy participants (female/male: 2/10, mean age: 35.3 ± 8.4 years) were asked to perform the simulated movements (all the tasks were performed five times for 5 s each with a 30‐s rest interval). The electrodes were placed on the masseter, infrahyoid, inframandibular, and chin muscles. A sound sensor was placed adjacent to the masseter. The EMG and sound data were sampled at 1 and 44.1 kHz, respectively. Single‐ and multi‐stream hidden Markov models (HMMs) were used to automatically discriminate the tested behavior from the others using a hamming window with 100 ms and shift length of 50 ms. The leave‐one‐out method was used for training and testing the model, with data from 11 participants used for training and one for testing. Each participant was evaluated, and the final performance was measured by averaging the results of 12 classification trials. The validity of the discrimination was assessed by calculating the harmony mean values using six EMG signals and the sound data. Results The masseter EMG demonstrated significantly higher discrimination accuracy in the single‐stream model ( p < 0.05, One‐way ANOVA, Tukey HDS). The multi‐stream model also demonstrated higher accuracy; however, no significant difference was observed. Notably, the accuracy of BMwoTC was less than 0.5. Conclusion The machine‐learning‐based discriminative system accurately discriminates BMwTC from non‐BM using masseter EMG.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Minakuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974616cbb9d90c67120b385https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/7874254
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence of bruxism in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients: A systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions2023 · 16 citations
  2. 2Functional evaluation of jaw and suprahyoid muscle activities during chewing2022 · 11 citations
  3. 3EMG-Based Speech Recognition Using Hidden Markov Models With Global Control Variables2008 · 81 citations
  4. 4An Experimental Study on Dynamic Features of Speech Structure2012 · 2 citations
  5. 5The inclusion of hyoid muscles improve moment generating capacity and dynamic simulations in musculoskeletal models of the head and neck2018 · 84 citations