PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Journal of Applied Polymer Science0 citations

Mixing Element Structure in Direct Fiber Feeding Injection Molding: Correlating Microstructure and Fiber Morphology With Length Retention and Mechanical Properties in GF / PP Composites

View Full Paper
QGQiang GongMWM WuTZTianshuo Zheng

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate screw mixing elements in direct fiber feeding injection molding to optimize fiber retention and mechanical properties.
  • Compared DFFIM and two-step methods for fiber retention and dispersion
  • Evaluated four screw mixing elements: SWE, CPE, PPE, and SNE
  • Measured mechanical properties including tensile and bending strengths
  • DFFIM retained significantly longer fibers compared to the two-step method (30.79% vs. 12.4%)
  • PPE achieved the best balance of fiber retention and dispersion, resulting in tensile strength of 92.27 MPa
  • CPE produced the maximum impact strength of 84.91 kJ/m2 but prioritized dispersion uniformity

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study systematically evaluated screw mixing elements for direct fiber feeding injection molding (DFFIM), addressing the critical yet unresolved trade‐off between fiber length retention and fiber dispersion in glass fiber/polypropylene (GF/PP) composites. A comparative analysis between DFFIM and the conventional “two‐step” method confirmed that DFFIM retained significantly longer fibers, with 30.79% of fibers exceeding 2 mm in length compared with 12.4% for the “two‐step” method, but exhibited poorer dispersion. To address this limitation, four screw mixing elements, standard screw element (SWE), cylindrical pin element (CPE), pineapple pin element (PPE), and SAXTON element (SNE), were designed and evaluated. PPE, characterized by a low shear and long residence time profile, achieved the best overall balance between fiber length retention and dispersion, resulting in the highest tensile and bending strengths (92.27 and 128.74 MPa, respectively). In contrast, the high‐shear CPE prioritized dispersion uniformity and produced the maximum impact strength (84.91 kJ/m 2 ). This study elucidates the fiber length–dispersion trade‐off governed by shear stress and residence time and provides clear selection guidelines based on target mechanical properties, with PPE recommended for strength‐critical applications and CPE for optimal impact resistance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974616cbb9d90c67120b388https://doi.org/10.1002/app.70427
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of compound compatibilizer and CaTiO3 filler on the properties of polypropylene/polyphenylene ether/glass fiber composites2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Compounding Fiber Reinforced Polymers: Process Development, Implementation, and Observations While Investigating the Impact of Surface Treatment and Screw Design on Fiber Unbundling, Breakage, and Distribution2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Analysis of the Dispersive and Distributive Mixing Effect of Screw Elements on the Co-Rotating Twin-Screw Extruder with Particle Tracking2024 · 22 citations
  4. 4Effect of injection molding conditions on GF/PP connection properties2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Polypropylene-glass-fiber composites fabricated by direct-fiber-feeding injection molding: effect of sizing agent and screw speed2018 · 3 citations