PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Comparative Political Studies0 citations

Varieties of Communism

View Full Paper
DSDan SlaterUniversity of MichiganMBMichaël BernhardUniversity of Florida

Key Points

  • To investigate the distinct characteristics of communist regimes compared to other authoritarian systems and each other.
  • Comparative analysis of different communist regimes
  • Examination of historical contexts in East Asia and Eastern Europe
  • Discussion of ideological and institutional features
  • Communist regimes showed significant variation across different historical contexts.
  • Key differences emerged between East Asian and Eastern European communist systems.
  • Communism remains a vital category for understanding authoritarianism in comparative politics.

Abstract

Comparative politics has moved on from communism too quickly. Even as authoritarianism takes center stage in the subfield, the most important authoritarian regime type of the 20 th century has faded into a footnote. Proceeding in a similar spirit but with less sweeping ambition than the “Varieties of Capitalism” and “Varieties of Democracy” projects, this special issue and wider research agenda considers how communist regimes have differed both from other authoritarian regimes and from each other. Even while sharing certain ideological and institutional features that made them analytically distinctive, communist regimes historically emerged and evolved in very different contexts and in very different ways. Assembled essays on communist regimes in East Asia and Eastern Europe reveal the promise of bringing communism as a category back into our comparative conversations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Slater et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974616cbb9d90c67120b405https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251414049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper