PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Horticulturae1 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Physiological Traits in Four Citrus Cultivars

View Full Paper
GGG. GulloAPA PerroneSTSaverio Tegano

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze how different citrus rootstocks regulate water relations and biomass allocation, affecting vegetative vigor.
  • Compared four citrus genotypes—Sour Orange, Volkamer Lemon, Swingle Citrumelo, and Troyer Citrange.
  • Assessed morphological traits, biomass distribution, and hydraulic properties.
  • Investigated physiological strategies independently from scion effects.
  • Rootstock-specific differences in water acquisition, transport, and utilization were observed.
  • CTR showed high hydraulic conductance and greater biomass allocation, leading to enhanced vigor.
  • SO and VL exhibited intermediate performance, while TC had restricted hydraulic capacity with lower biomass and vigor.

Abstract

This study considers citrus rootstocks as autonomous biological entities and examines whether, and to what extent, they differently regulate plant–water relations and biomass allocation as well as how such physiological variations translate into differences in vegetative vigor. To address these questions, four citrus genotypes—Sour Orange (SO), Volkamer Lemon (VL), Swingle Citrumelo (CTR), and Troyer Citrange (TC)—were compared with respect to their morphological traits, biomass distribution, and hydraulic properties. These four rootstocks were selected as they represent contrasting genetic backgrounds and well-documented differences in vigor, stress tolerance, and hydraulic behavior, providing an effective model for assessing intrinsic physiological variability. The findings reveal pronounced rootstock-specific differences in water acquisition, transport, and utilization, with direct implications for the hydraulic architecture, leaf water status, and partitioning of biomass between above- and belowground organs. CTR exhibited a highly integrated hydraulic strategy, characterized by elevated conductance across both aerial and root systems and accompanied by greater biomass allocation to the canopy and absorptive roots, resulting in an enhanced overall vigor. SO and VL displayed an intermediate physiological performance, whereas TC demonstrated a restricted hydraulic transport capacity, which is associated with lower biomass allocation, reduced leaf water potential, and diminished vigor. By assessing rootstocks independently of scion influences, this work demonstrates that variations between citrus rootstocks cannot be explained solely by morphological traits but instead reflect contrasting physiological strategies governing the coordinated management of water and carbon resources. These results highlight the rootstock as a central determinant of hydraulic functioning, biomass partitioning, and plant vigor and provide a conceptual basis for selecting rootstocks that are better suited to water-limited environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gullo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b1cefeba4585c2d6d3e0https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12010121
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper