PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Nanomanufacturing and Metrology0 citationsOpen Access

Experimental and Numerical Study of Millisecond Laser Micro-Processing Based on a Dual Neural Network System

View Full Paper
WHWenhao HanLWLiming WeiGWGuo Wei

Key Points

  • This study aims to achieve precise control of the depth of nonpenetrating structures in millisecond laser microprocessing using neural networks.
  • Developed a dual neural network system with a prediction model and a simulation model.
  • Used a feedforward backpropagation neural network for nonlinear mapping of features, parameters, and simulation results.
  • Employed a quasi-continuous wave fiber laser for experimental validation and trained the network using data from a confocal microscope.
  • Closed-loop simulation depth average error of 3.96% achieved with the models.
  • Actual processing verification showed a depth average error of 4.52% and a diameter average error of 3.77%.
  • Demonstrated engineering applicability with a depth control precision of ± 5%.

Abstract

Abstract To address the technical challenge of precisely controlling the depth of nonpenetrating structures in millisecond laser microprocessing, this study proposes a closed-loop prediction and simulation system based on dual neural network models. A feedforward backpropagation neural network is used to construct a nonlinear mapping model of “target features–process parameters–simulation results” to achieve high-precision control of blind-hole features in a nickel-based high-temperature alloy. The prediction model outputs the process parameters (peak power, duty ratio, and pulse number) by inputting the target depth and diameter. In contrast, the simulation model simulates the processing results to form a closed-loop calibration. The experiment was conducted with a millisecond quasi-continuous wave fiber laser, and datasets for training the network were obtained by a confocal microscope. Through model structure optimization, employing a prediction model with four hidden layers of 30 neurons and a simulation model with three hidden layers of 30 neurons, the nonlinear error caused by the thermal accumulation effect was effectively suppressed. The results show that the closed-loop simulation depth average error of the two models is 3.96%, while the actual processing verification depth average error is 4.52%, and the diameter average error is 3.77% and 4.59%, respectively. The study reveals the potential influence of the dynamic instability of the high-power molten pool on the model error, demonstrates the engineering applicability of the depth closed-loop control at ± 5% and provides an efficient and intelligent solution for complex microstructure processing in aerospace, energy equipment, and related fields.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Han et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b1eafeba4585c2d6d6afhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-025-00287-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development of an Artificial Neural Network-Based Model for Prediction and Compensation of Hole Depth by Femtosecond Laser Drilling2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Prediction of laser drilled hole geometries from linear cutting operation by way of artificial neural networks2021 · 16 citations
  3. 3Blind micro-hole array Ti6Al4V templates for carrying biomaterials fabricated by fiber laser drilling2015 · 33 citations
  4. 4Process modeling and optimization in laser drilling of bulk metallic glasses based on GABPNN and machine vision2023 · 16 citations
  5. 5A new double spiral scanning method for CFRP step blind hole drilling by nanosecond UV laser2025 · 7 citations