PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026European Heart Journal Open1 citationsOpen Access

Extraction and reimplantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with non-surgically treated infective endocarditis: a nationwide cohort study

View Full Paper
MLMohammed Bakir Ahmad LaftaAAAmna AlhakakLØLauge Østergaard

Key Result

In patients with infective endocarditis who underwent CIED extraction, 59.9% were reimplanted within three months, with no significant outcome differences based on reimplantation status.

Key Points

  • This research aimed to assess reimplantation rates and outcomes after CIED extraction in infective endocarditis patients without surgical intervention.
  • Included Danish residents aged ≥18 with first-time infective endocarditis from 2010-2021
  • Analyzed data from nationwide registries
  • Focused on CIED reimplantation within 90 days post-extraction
  • Compared outcomes between reimplanted and non-reimplanted patients
  • Among 661 patients, 396 (59.9%) were reimplanted within three months
  • Median time to reimplantation was 29 days
  • No significant differences in six-month rates of recurrent bacteraemia between groups (2.5% vs. 1.8%)
  • Mortality rates were 11.2% for non-reimplanted and 7.0% for reimplanted patients (p=0.11)

Structured PICO

Does CIED reimplantation within 90 days after extraction affect recurrent bacteraemia or mortality in patients with non-surgically treated infective endocarditis?

P
Population
661 adults (≥18 years) with first-time infective endocarditis (2010–2021) and a pre-existing CIED who underwent CIED extraction without concurrent valve surgery.
I
Intervention
CIED reimplantation within 90 days after extraction
C
Comparator
No CIED reimplantation within 90 days after extraction
O
Outcome
CIED reimplantation within 90 days after extractionhard clinical

In patients undergoing CIED extraction for infective endocarditis, reimplantation within 90 days is common and not associated with increased six-month mortality or recurrent bacteremia.

Abstract

Abstract Background Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines recommend complete CIED extraction; however, the optimal timing for reimplantation remains uncertain. Purpose We aimed to evaluate CIED reimplantation rates, and outcomes in patients with non-surgically treated IE who underwent CIED extraction. Methods We included all Danish residents ≥18 years diagnosed with first-time IE (2010–2021), with a pre-existing CIED, who underwent CIED extraction without concurrent valve surgery. Data were obtained from Danish nationwide registries. The primary variable of interest was CIED reimplantation within 90 days after extraction. Reimplantation rates were described, and reimplantation status was used to stratify patients for analysis of secondary outcomes, including recurrent IE-related bacteraemia and all-cause mortality within six months. Results Among 661 patients with CIED extraction due to IE, 396 (59.9%) underwent reimplantation within three months, with a median of 29 days (IQR:19–42 days). There was no significant difference in the six-month cumulative incidence of recurrent bacteraemia with IE (2.5% 95% CI:0.95–5.5 vs. 1.8% 95% CI:0.8–3.6 p=0.55) or mortality (11.2% 95% CI:7.0–16.4 vs. 7.0% 95% CI:4.7–10.0; p =0.11) between non-reimplanted and reimplanted patients. Conclusion In IE patients who underwent CIED extraction, 60% of patients were reimplanted within three months with substantial variation in timing. No significant differences in outcomes were found by reimplantation status.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lafta et al. (2026) studied this question. In patients with infective endocarditis who underwent CIED extraction, 59.9% were reimplanted within three months, with no significant outcome differences based on reimplantation status.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b229feba4585c2d6d9a4https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeag008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 116-Year Trends in the Infection Burden for Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the United States2011 · 777 citations
  2. 2Positive predictive value of cardiac examination, procedure and surgery codes in the Danish National Patient Registry: a population-based validation study2016 · 171 citations
  3. 3Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are expensive and associated with prolonged hospitalisation: UK Retrospective Observational Study2019 · 44 citations
  4. 4Syncope and paroxysmal atrioventricular block2017 · 71 citations
  5. 5HRS/ACCF Expert Consensus Statement on Pacemaker Device and Mode Selection2012 · 66 citations