PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Journal of Applied Ecology2 citations

Productivity‐dependent effects of adapted mowing regimes on arthropod communities in roadside grasslands

View Full Paper
WBWiene BakkerWageningen University & ResearchFFFakhrul Imran Mohd FizalWageningen University & ResearchAGArjen De GrootWageningen University & Research

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess how different mowing frequencies and heights affect arthropod communities in roadside grasslands.
  • Conducted a 3-year field experiment in 10 Dutch roadside grasslands
  • Compared standard late August mowing to early November and June mowing at different heights
  • Used pitfall traps to sample ground-dwelling arthropods and emergence traps for emerging arthropods
  • Monitored flower availability as a proxy for pollinator food resources.
  • Early November mowing improved late-season arthropod emergence and flower availability across all productivity sites
  • In low-productive sites, increasing mowing frequency did not benefit species groups
  • In high-productive sites, more frequent mowing increased overall diversity and flower availability, especially with a low June cut

Abstract

Abstract Arthropod diversity is rapidly declining in semi‐natural grasslands. Among the driving factors are nitrogen deposition and climate change, which typically increase vegetation productivity and extend the growing season. These changes can negatively affect plant diversity and simplify vegetation structure and thereby indirectly reduce arthropod diversity. Adjusting the mowing frequency, height and/or timing may counteract these effects and address shifts in seasonal activity of arthropods. This study evaluated the effects of these adjustments on arthropod diversity under current environmental conditions. We performed a 3‐year (2021–2023) field experiment in 10 Dutch roadside grasslands across a productivity gradient. The standard late August mowing (control) was compared to early November mowing and to June mowing at high (15 cm) or low (6 cm) height followed by either late August or early November mowing. In 2023, we assessed the effects of these mowing treatments on ground‐dwelling arthropods (sampled using pitfall traps), emerging arthropods (soil‐ and vegetation‐dwelling arthropods sampled using emergence traps) and flower availability (used as a proxy for food availability for pollinators). Our results show that delaying the final cut to early November was advantageous for late‐season emerging arthropods and flower availability regardless of site productivity. Emerging arthropod biomass in early autumn was approximately equal to that in spring and summer, underscoring the importance of delaying the final cut. In low‐productive sites, increasing the mowing frequency from one to two cuts per year did not benefit any species group. Conversely, in high‐productive sites, increasing the mowing frequency generally increased the diversity of ground‐dwelling arthropods, particularly in summer, and increased flower availability in spring. These benefits were most pronounced with a low cut in June. Yet, the June cut caused a relatively long (>1 month) reduction in flower availability and a lower summer biomass of emerging arthropods, regardless of cutting height. This suggests that regimes with two cuts per year could be more beneficial if applied in a phased or rotational manner. Synthesis and applications . Adjusted mowing dates and, in productive grasslands, an increased mowing frequency may benefit grassland arthropod communities under current environmental conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bakker et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b2c8feba4585c2d6e3aahttps://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70289
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The day after mowing: Time and type of mowing influence grassland arthropods2024 · 31 citations
  2. 2The influence of cutting height on arthropods in farm grassland2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Higher cutting frequency can restore semi‐natural habitat quality on farmland2025
  4. 4Arthropod conservation in roadside verges: Unmown refuges outperform mowing equipment changes2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Long‐term effects of annual mowing on plant diversity, community composition, and temporal stability in wet grasslands2026