PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Right to Privacy: A Human Rights Perspective

View Full Paper
AWABIATHA ADU WIAFE

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the threats AI poses to the right to privacy and the adequacy of current legal frameworks.
  • Adopts a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology
  • Analyzes international and regional human rights instruments and judicial decisions
  • Evaluates emerging AI-specific regulatory initiatives
  • Incorporates comparative perspectives from various jurisdictions
  • Traditional privacy frameworks are inadequate against AI-driven practices like surveillance and profiling
  • AI exacerbates power imbalances between individuals and institutions
  • Proposes a rights-based redefinition of privacy that includes collective aspects
  • Recommends mandatory human rights impact assessments and enhanced regulatory measures

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly transformed systems of governance, commerce, and social organisation, fundamentally altering how personal data is collected, processed, and utilised. While AI technologies promise efficiency, innovation, and enhanced decision-making, they simultaneously pose profound challenges to the protection of the right to privacy—a core human right grounded in dignity, autonomy, and democratic participation. This thesis critically examines the extent to which contemporary AI systems threaten the right to privacy under international human rights law and evaluates whether existing legal frameworks are adequate to respond to these challenges. The study adopts a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, drawing on international and regional human rights instruments, judicial decisions, soft law standards, and scholarly literature. It analyses key legal regimes, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, the General Data Protection Regulation, and emerging AI-specific regulatory initiatives such as the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act. The thesis further incorporates comparative perspectives from Europe, the United Kingdom, Africa, and selected Global South jurisdictions to illustrate uneven regulatory capacity and enforcement. The central argument advanced is that traditional privacy frameworks—largely premised on individual consent, secrecy, and data control—are increasingly inadequate in the face of AI-driven practices such as mass surveillance, biometric identification, predictive analytics, automated decision-making, and inference-based profiling. These technologies generate structural, collective, and anticipatory harms that transcend individualised notions of privacy and undermine existing enforcement mechanisms. The research demonstrates that AI intensifies power asymmetries between individuals, states, and corporations, eroding informational autonomy and enabling forms of surveillance and social control incompatible with human rights norms. To address these deficiencies, the thesis proposes a reconceptualisation of privacy as a positive, structural, and collective human right. It argues for a human rights–based framework for AI governance that prioritises dignity, accountability, transparency, and non-discrimination over purely market-driven or ethics-based approaches. Key recommendations include mandatory human rights impact assessments for high-risk AI systems, strengthened regulatory oversight and enforcement powers, enhanced algorithmic transparency and explainability, recognition of group privacy harms, and greater international regulatory harmonisation. The thesis contributes to legal scholarship by integrating AI governance into the core of international human rights law and offering a principled framework for safeguarding privacy in the digital age. It concludes that without proactive, rights-based regulation, AI risks entrenching systemic privacy violations and undermining the normative foundations of human rights and democratic society. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Right to Privacy; International Human Rights Law; Data protection; Surveillance; Algorithmic Governance; Group Privacy

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

ABIATHA ADU WIAFE (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697703f6722626c4468e8fbehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18362181
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Protecting Human Rights in The Digital Era Through the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Privacy2026
  2. 2ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCEAND THE NEED FOR THE GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS FRAMEWORK2026
  3. 3The challenges of AI regulation: data protection, civil rights, and landmark cases2026
  4. 4Algorithm Power and Legal Boundaries: Rights Conflicts and Governance Responses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence2025 · 7 citations
  5. 5The Development of Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Human Rights Protection from An Ethical and Legal Perspective2025