PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 27, 2008Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety134 citationsOpen Access

Trends in adherence to secondary prevention medications in elderly post‐myocardial infarction patients

View Full Paper
NCNiteesh K. ChoudhrySSSoko SetoguchiRLRaisa Levin

Key Result

Medication adherence to statins improved from 38.6% in 1995 to 56.2% in 2003 among post-MI patients, but ACEI/ARBs showed no improvement.

Structured PICO

Has adherence to secondary prevention medications improved over time in elderly post-myocardial infarction patients?

P
Population
Lower-income Medicare beneficiaries discharged from the hospital after their first acute myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Secondary prevention medications (statin, ACEI/ARB, beta-blocker)
C
Comparator
Historical comparison (1995 vs. 2003)
O
Outcome
Medication adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] for each medication in the subsequent year)

While adherence to secondary prevention medications after acute MI improved modestly between 1995 and 2003, rates of non-adherence remain extremely high, highlighting a critical gap in post-MI care.

Abstract

Abstract Background Poor levels of medication adherence for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) have been documented but it is unclear whether adherence has improved over time. Methods We assembled a retrospective cohort of lower‐income Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged from the hospital after their first acute myocardial infarction (MI) between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2003. For patients prescribed a statin, ACEI/ARB, beta‐blocker, and all 3 of these medications after the hospital discharge, we evaluated medication adherence by determining the proportion of days covered (PDC) for each medication in the subsequent year. Results Our cohort consisted of a total of 33 646 patients. Adherence rates for statins and beta‐blockers, but not ACEI/ARB, increased significantly over time but remained suboptimal. For example, among those patients that received a statin after discharge, 38.6% were fully adherent with therapy in 1995 in contrast to 56.2% in 2003 ( p value for trend <0.001). Of patients prescribed all 3 of statin, beta‐blocker, and ACEI/ARB, 29.1% and 46.4% were fully adherent in 1995 and 2003, respectively ( p value for trend <0.001). Conclusions Our analysis demonstrates statistically significant but modest improvements in medication adherence for statins and beta‐blockers, but not ACEI/ARBs, among patients discharged from hospital after acute MI. Despite these improvements, rates of non‐adherence to these highly effective therapies remain extremely high. Given the health and economic consequences of non‐adherence, the development of cost‐effective strategies to improve medication adherence should be a clear priority. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choudhry et al. (2008) studied this question. Medication adherence to statins improved from 38.6% in 1995 to 56.2% in 2003 among post-MI patients, but ACEI/ARBs showed no improvement.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697a2e26d8b63e6fafa6a589https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1671
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper