PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology0 citations

Mechanical characterisation and finite-element assessment of 3-D-printed PLA auxetic lattices with combined re-entrant–star topologies

View Full Paper
YCYih-Lin ChengYLYen-Ting LiRSRapita Astriani Siregar

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the mechanical properties of 3-D-printed PLA auxetic lattices with various topologies.
  • Examined mechanical behaviour of PLA auxetic lattices using uniaxial tension tests.
  • Utilized finite-element models for simulations in Ansys software.
  • Determined mesh convergence with a tetrahedral size of 0.5 mm.
  • Star topology exhibited the highest nearly isotropic stiffness of approximately 1.7 MPa.
  • Hybrid RRSS configuration excelled in X-axis compression with 133 MPa and 460 N.
  • SSRR showed superior energy absorption, while SRSR had the highest Y-axis tensile resistance of 1.502 MPa.

Abstract

This study examines the mechanical behaviour of PLA auxetic lattices produced via fused-filament fabrication, including single topologies (re-entrant, modified re-entrant, star) and hybrid sequences (RSRS, SRSR, RRSS, SSRR). Lattices with 0.8 mm wall thickness were tested under uniaxial compression and tension along X and Y axes, supported by calibrated finite-element models in Ansys. Mesh convergence determined a 0.5 mm tetrahedral size, keeping deformation and stress errors under 2%. Experimental results showed strong anisotropy: star had the highest, nearly isotropic stiffness (≈ 1.7 MPa peak at 0.04% strain), while re-entrant was highly flexible in X but stiffer in Y. Hybridisation reduced directional disparity—RRSS excelled in X-axis compression (133 MPa, 460 N), SSRR absorbed more energy, and SRSR achieved the highest Y-axis tensile resistance (1.502 MPa, 601 N). SSRR remained the most compliant (0.632 MPa). Simulation–experiment errors ranged from 0.77 to 11.9% (compression) to 24–34% (tension), largely due to simplified material modelling. Star and RRSS/SSRR hybrids are optimal for load-bearing, quasi-isotropic stiffness, while modified re-entrant and RSRS/SRSR hybrids suit energy-absorbing designs, offering guidelines for lightweight, impact-resistant structure optimisation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69800910aa6434d8c2036d64https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-026-17535-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper