PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Catalysts1 citationsOpen Access

Functional Characterization and Metabolic Engineering of Key Genes in L-Cysteine Biosynthesis in Bacillus licheniformis

View Full Paper
JYJing YanJTJunbing TaoFXFengxu Xiao

Key Points

  • The goal is to enhance L-cysteine production by characterizing its biosynthetic pathway and optimizing key genetic components.
  • Characterization of L-cysteine biosynthetic pathway in Bacillus licheniformis
  • Supplementation with exogenous serine to evaluate gene expression
  • Targeted gene deletions of specific genes to minimize side reactions
  • Overexpression of feedback-resistant mutant cysEf and transporter eamA to improve yields
  • Testing engineered strains in shake-flask fermentation
  • Exogenous serine increased expression of genes involved in L-cysteine synthesis.
  • Engineered strain produced 1.075 g/L of L-cysteine in fermentation.
  • Achieved an 18.69% molar conversion yield for L-cysteine synthesis.
  • Revealed differences in sulfur metabolism between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Abstract

This study systematically characterized the L-cysteine biosynthetic pathway in Bacillus licheniformis and demonstrated that exogenous serine supplementation significantly upregulated the expression of pathway-associated genes, confirming serine as the primary precursor driving L-cysteine synthesis. Through targeted gene deletions, we generated knockout strains BL2ΔglyA, BL2ΔsdaAA, BL2ΔmetC, BL2Δ2, and BL2Δ3 to minimize precursor diversion and product degradation. Combinatorial overexpression of the feedback-resistant mutant cysEf and the transporter eamA yielded an engineered strain achieving 1.075 g/L L-cysteine in shake-flask fermentation with an 18.69% molar conversion yield. These findings highlight the potential of B. licheniformis as a platform for sulfur metabolic engineering and provide a sustainable fermentation strategy to replace traditional high-pollution hydrolysis-based L-cysteine production. Additionally, this work reveals fundamental differences in sulfur metabolism networks between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, elucidating microbial metabolic diversity and the cross-regulatory mechanisms linking sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen metabolism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fb97c1c9540dea80d678https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020129
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improved <scp>l</scp> -Cysteine Production in <i>Corynebacterium glutamicum</i> through Metabolic Engineering and High-Throughput Screening2026
  2. 2An Artificial Biosynthetic Pathway for <scp>l</scp> -Cysteine Mimicking 2-Methylcitrate Cycle2026
  3. 3Engineering of the Lrp/AsnC‐type transcriptional regulator DecR as a genetically encoded biosensor for multilevel optimization of L‐cysteine biosynthesis pathway in <i>Escherichia coli</i>2024
  4. 4Biosensor-driven Evolution and Transcriptome-Guided Chassis Engineering Enhance Endogenous l -Cysteine Supply for Ergothioneine Production2026
  5. 5Enhancing lycopene production in Bacillus subtilis by overcoming a critical enzymatic bottleneck2025