PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026steel research international0 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Varied Solidification Methods on Characteristics of Nonmetallic Inclusions in 304 Stainless Steel

View Full Paper
XDXin‐yu DuCLCheng‐song LiuYWYong Wang

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate how varying solidification methods affect the characteristics of nonmetallic inclusions in 304 stainless steel.
  • Conducted five cooling experiments to observe the solidification process
  • Characterized and analyzed the features of nonmetallic inclusions
  • Measured average inclusion diameter and number density at varying cooling rates
  • Analyzed compositional changes of inclusions with different cooling rates
  • Developed a kinetic model for inclusion growth based on solute segregation
  • Average inclusion diameter increased from 1.64 to 3.31 μm as cooling rate decreased
  • Number density of inclusions declined from 31.97 to 16.47 mm−2 with slower cooling rates
  • Percentage of small-sized inclusions (<3 μm) dropped from 93.8% to 41.4%
  • Contents of MnO and SiO2 in inclusions increased, while Cr2O3 content decreased with reduced cooling rates
  • Kinetic model predictions were strongly correlated with experimental results

Abstract

This research examines the impact of varying solidification methods on the behavior of nonmetallic inclusions in 304 stainless steel during the solidification process. Five sets of cooling experiments are carried out to systematically characterize and analyze the inclusion features. The findings indicate that when the cooling rate is reduced from 45.33 to 1.21 K s −1 , the average inclusion diameter increases from 1.64 to 3.31 μm, while the number density declines from 31.97 to 16.47 mm −2 . Specifically, the percentage of small‐sized inclusions (<3 μm) drops sharply from 93.8% to 41.4%. In terms of composition, as the cooling rate diminishes, the average contents of MnO and SiO 2 in the inclusions rise, whereas the Cr 2 O 3 content decreases. Morphologically, the inclusions undergo a gradual transition from spherical or ellipsoidal homogeneous‐phase particles to irregular multiphase structures. Building upon a solute segregation model, a kinetic model for inclusion growth is developed. Calculations performed with this kinetic model reveal a notable inverse relationship between the size of the inclusions and the rate of cooling, as described by the fitted equation: . The predictions generated by the model show a strong correlation with the experimental results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Du et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fb97c1c9540dea80d6c0https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.202501095
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper