PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Stroke0 citations

Abstract A046: Flow Diversion on Concurrent Anticoagulation: Multicenter Propensity-Score Weighted Analysis of Safety and Efficacy

View Full Paper
JRJoanna M. RoyPPPious D. PatelBMBasel Musmar

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze the safety and efficacy of flow diversion in patients who are on chronic anticoagulation compared to those who are not.
  • Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing flow diversion across nine institutions from January 2018 to January 2024.
  • Patients were divided into two cohorts based on their history of anticoagulation.
  • Outcomes evaluated included angiographic occlusion, retreatment, hemorrhagic complications, and functional dependence.
  • Of 308 patients, 21.1% were on anticoagulation prior to flow diversion.
  • After adjustment, patients on anticoagulation had similar rates of angiographic occlusion and retreatment compared to those not on anticoagulation.
  • Patients on anticoagulation had lower odds of hemorrhagic complications, indicating safety during the procedure.

Abstract

Introduction: Patients undergoing flow diversion (FD) may require chronic anticoagulation (AC) due to underlying comorbidities. There is limited literature on the safety and efficacy of FD in these patients. Our study analyzes outcomes of FD among patients receiving AC to those without AC. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent FD at nine participating institutions from January 2018 to January 2024. Patients were dichotomized based on their history of AC. Outcomes of interest were angiographic occlusion, retreatment, hemorrhagic complications and functional dependence on follow-up. Results: Of 308 total patients, 65 (21.1%) were on oral anticoagulation prior to FD, while 243 patients (88.9%) were not on AC prior to FD. The cohort on AC was older (mean age: 64.4 vs. 57.2 years, P<0.001), had a greater proportion of patients with hypertension (69.2% vs. 46.1%, P<0.001) and baseline functional dependence (13.8% vs. 4.9%, P<0.05). The cohort on AC also had a smaller proportion of female patients (72.3% vs. 84%, P<0.05), patients who were on antiplatelets prior to admission (30.8% vs. 53.9%, P<0.001), previously treated aneurysms (18.5% vs. 30.9%, P<0.05) and ruptured aneurysms (4.6% vs. 16%, P<0.05). After inverse probability treatment weighting analysis, rates of angiographic occlusion (aOR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.36- 1.32), P= 0.27), retreatment (aOR: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.42- 5.76, P= 0.507) and functional dependence (aOR: 4.33 (0.92- 20.43, P= 0.065) were comparable across cohorts. Patients who received AC had 0.11-fold lower odds (95% CI: 0.01- 0.94, P= 0.045) for hemorrhagic complications (aOR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01- 0.94, P= 0.045). Conclusions: FD in patients on AC offers rates of angiographic occlusion comparable to those without AC, with no increased rates of hemorrhagic complications, retreatment and functional dependence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fb97c1c9540dea80d752https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.a046
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper