PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026JAMA Network Open0 citationsOpen Access

Ann Arbor Guide to Triaging Adults With Suspected Urinary Tract Infection for In-Person and Telehealth Settings

View Full Paper
JMJennifer MeddingsKCKristin ChrouserKFKaren Fowler

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the best triage and management strategies for adults with suspected urinary tract infections, focusing on variable factors.
  • Performed a scoping review of UTI-related literature from 2009 to June 2024.
  • Utilized the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with a panel of 13 healthcare professionals to rate clinical scenarios.
  • Assessed 136 clinical scenarios with various management strategies regarding appropriateness of treatment and testing.
  • Identified key recommendations for in-person visits based on specific concerning symptoms.
  • Established criteria for urine testing and empiric antibiotic treatment based on patient characteristics.
  • Defined appropriateness ratings for urinary tract infection management in both telehealth and in-person settings.

Abstract

Importance Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in ambulatory care settings and the primary reason for antibiotic prescribing. Despite several guidelines focused on the type and duration of antibiotics prescribed for treating UTI, there is limited outpatient guidance on how to best triage patients with presumed UTI. Objective To assess the appropriateness of different triage and management recommendations involving empiric antibiotics, urine testing strategies, and visit types and how these recommendations vary by patient sex, age, presenting symptoms, and clinical history. Evidence Review Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, a 13-member multidisciplinary panel (physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses) performed a scoping review of the literature publications from 2009 to June 2024 and rated the appropriateness of 136 clinical scenarios (48 for women, 49 for men, and 39 scenarios not specific to sex) with up to 9 management strategies per scenario for a total of 1094 scenarios. For each scenario, experts rated the appropriateness of empiric treatment, types of urine testing, and triage to visit type (in-person, virtual, or none) as appropriate (ie, benefits outweigh risks), inappropriate, or of uncertain appropriateness. Appropriateness ratings were summarized into 2 groups: nonpregnant adult women and adult men. Findings Major recommendations based on symptoms included (1) same-day in-person evaluation if symptoms were concerning for pyelonephritis, complicated cystitis, or urinary obstruction; (2) a visit if additional nonurinary symptoms were present (ie, diarrhea, genital discharge, or cough); (3) neither urine testing nor empiric treatment solely due to a change in urine color or appearance without other bladder (cystitis) symptoms; (4) empiric treatment without testing or a visit, for women, if there were new classic cystitis symptoms of dysuria, urinary frequency, urgency, or suprapubic pain without risks for antibiotic resistance; (5) urinalysis with culture (ideally reflexed to culture) before taking first antibiotic dose for women at risk of antibiotic resistance (eg, recent antibiotic treatment for UTI or recurrent UTIs) and all men; and (6) empiric treatment considered for patients with barriers to obtaining timely urine testing or visits. Conclusions and Relevance The appropriateness of empiric antibiotics, urine testing, and different clinical evaluation options were defined for adults presenting with concerns for UTI in common ambulatory triage settings, including telehealth. These criteria for ambulatory triage of suspected UTI symptoms in adults are anticipated to help standardize and improve the appropriateness of empiric antibiotic prescribing, urine testing, and visit type triage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meddings et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fbf6c1c9540dea80db9dhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.56135
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper