PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Stroke0 citations

Abstract DP028: Venous Outflow and Outcomes After Endovascular Thrombectomy: Interaction With Blood Pressure Variability in a Post Hoc Analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP Trial

View Full Paper
HPH. S. ParkJJJae Wook JungKKKwang Hyun Kim

Key Points

  • To investigate the relationship between venous outflow status and clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy, particularly the influence of blood pressure variability.
  • Conducted a secondary analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP trial
  • Categorized patients based on cortical vein opacification score for venous outflow
  • Assessed efficacy and safety outcomes including modified Rankin Scale scores and types of hemorrhages
  • Analyzed blood pressure variability parameters within 24 hours post-randomization
  • Unfavorable venous outflow correlated with lower odds of mRS 0-2 and mRS 0-3 scores
  • Increased infarction volume was noted with unfavorable venous outflow
  • Unfavorable venous outflow was associated with higher odds of intracerebral and symptomatic hemorrhages
  • Increased systolic blood pressure variability was linked to poorer outcomes only in the unfavorable group

Abstract

Introduction: Despite previous studies suggesting an association between venous outflow (VO) and clinical outcomes, the relationship between VO status and comprehensive efficacy and safety outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), including the influence of systolic blood pressure variability (BPV), remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP trial. Patients were categorized into unfavorable VO (cortical vein opacification score (CVOS) <3) or favorable VO (CVOS ≥3). Efficacy outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0–2 and 0–3 at three months, excellent NIHSS recovery, and final infarction volume (FIV). Safety outcomes consisted of any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, any parenchymal hemorrhage (PH), PH type 2, and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). BPV parameters, including time rate (TR), standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and variation independent of mean, were calculated within the first 24 hours after randomization. Results: Among 226 patients, unfavorable VO significantly correlated with lower odds of achieving mRS 0–2 (adjusted odds ratio aOR, 0.44 95% CI, 0.22–0.87), mRS 0–3 (aOR, 0.39 0.20–0.73), excellent NIHSS recovery (aOR, 0.40 0.15–0.95), and increased FIV (adjusted coefficient, 37.18 14.81–59.55). It was also associated with increased odds of any ICH (aOR, 2.28 1.20–4.39), symptomatic ICH (aOR, 9.82 3.12–39.40), any PH (aOR, 6.08 2.76–14.07), PH type 2 (aOR, 174.59 14.41–7276.24), and SAH (aOR, 2.44 1.13–5.29). Only increased systolic BPV TR correlated significantly with poorer efficacy outcomes in unfavorable VO group. Sensitivity analyses using a Bayesian approach yielded results consistent with the primary analysis Conclusion: Unfavorable VO was associated with poorer clinical and safety outcomes after successful recanalization following EVT and increased post-EVT BPV further worsened clinical outcomes only in unfavorable group. These finding suggest that BPV modulation may improve prognosis in stroke patients with unfavorable VO.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fc37c1c9540dea80df9fhttps://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.dp028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper