PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Lottery-based elections, power monopolization, and urban development: the case of Swiss city-states, 1666–1794

View Full Paper
JGJonas M. GewekeKRKatja Rost

Key Points

  • This research investigates how lottery-based elections affect political power distribution and urban development in Swiss city-states.
  • Analyzed historical data from Swiss city-states between 1666-1794
  • Used a difference-in-differences design to assess the impact of lottery systems
  • Compared political and economic metrics before and after election reforms
  • Lottery-based elections increased political seat equality within parliaments
  • Observed growth in trade tax revenues and volumes post-reform
  • Infrastructure expenditures rose following the implementation of lottery systems

Abstract

Early modern urban parliaments suffered an increasing monopolization of political power that hampered urban development. To combat power monopolization, some Swiss city-states reformed their election systems by randomly selecting political representatives from a pre-elected pool of candidates. We implement a difference-in-differences design and find that lottery-based election systems improved the equality of distribution of political seats within parliaments. Lottery-based elections also had positive effects on trade tax revenues, trade volumes, and infrastructure expenditures. We explain this finding by showing that lottery-based election systems fostered the election of merchants to top political positions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Geweke et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fc37c1c9540dea80e074https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-283274
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper