PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Wave Propagation on Discrete Foam Complexes: A DEC Framework with Isotropy Analysis

View Full Paper
ATAlexandru Toader

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze elastic wave propagation through different foam cell structures to assess their isotropy and anisotropy properties.
  • Computed elastic wave propagation using discrete exterior calculus (DEC).
  • Analyzed four specific foam structures: C15 Laves phase, Weaire-Phelan, Kelvin, and FCC.
  • Performed cross-validation to correlate geometric moments with Zener anisotropy.
  • Conducted statistical averaging over a significant number of foam grains.
  • C15 structure showed the lowest directional anisotropy at 0.93%.
  • Geometric moment predicted Zener anisotropy with a high correlation (Pearson r = -0.996).
  • The gauge sector demonstrated ~60× stronger isotropy than the elastic sector.
  • Anisotropy estimates were compatible with cavity Lorentz bounds with a 27× margin.
  • Discrete structures produced quadratic dispersion consistent with GRB time-of-flight limitations.

Abstract

We compute elastic wave propagation on periodic foam cell complexes using Discrete Exterior Calculus (DEC). Four structures are analyzed: C15 Laves phase, Weaire-Phelan, Kelvin (BCC foam), and FCC (control lattice). The C15 structure exhibits the lowest directional anisotropy (δv/v = 0. 93%) among candidates tested. A cross-validation shows that the geometric moment I₄ of edge directions predicts the Zener anisotropy AZ with Pearson r = -0. 996, confirming pipeline consistency. The gauge (Maxwell-like) sector shows ~60× stronger isotropy than the elastic sector on the same geometry (α ≈ 0. 015). Under statistical averaging over M ~ 10³⁴ grains per meter, predicted anisotropy is compatible with cavity Lorentz bounds (10⁻¹⁸) with 27× margin. The discrete structure produces n=2 (quadratic) dispersion, consistent with GRB time-of-flight constraints that exclude n=1.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alexandru Toader (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fc37c1c9540dea80e07ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18411569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper