PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Bioengineering0 citationsOpen Access

Feasibility of Golden Angle Spiral Real-Time Phase Contrast MRI at 0.55T: A Single-Center Prospective Study

View Full Paper
SPSalman PervaizCCChong ChenYLYingmin Liu

Key Points

  • The study aimed to assess the feasibility of real-time phase-contrast MRI at 0.55T for measuring blood flow.
  • Implemented RT-PCMR sequence with golden-angle spiral readout and compressed sensing reconstruction.
  • Included 33 participants: healthy volunteers and patients with cardiovascular disease.
  • Used breath-held segmented Cartesian PCMR as the reference standard.
  • In volunteers, RT-PCMR showed good agreement for net flow and peak flow rates, with no significant bias.
  • Undercounting of peak velocities was noted: 7.9% in aorta and 8.6% in main pulmonary artery.
  • In patients, peak flow rates were slightly underestimated, with differences of 6.2% and 4.6% for aorta and MPA, respectively.

Abstract

Background: Real-time phase-contrast magnetic resonance (RT-PCMR) imaging allows free-breathing assessment of blood flow across cardiac valves and vessels. However, the feasibility of free-breathing RT-PCMR on a mid-field (0.55T) MRI system has yet to be established. Aim: The primary objective of this study was to implement a RT-PCMR sequence using a dual-density golden-angle spiral readout with SENSE-based compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction on a 0.55T MRI system. The secondary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in an adult cohort comprising healthy volunteers and patients with cardiovascular disease. Materials and Methods: Data from 33 participants were included in the flow quantification analysis (healthy volunteers: n = 17, 9 females, mean age 30.4 ± 14.6 years; patients: n = 16, 11 females, mean age 45.9 ± 17.4 years), with breath-held (BH) segmented Cartesian PCMR used as the reference standard. Results: In volunteers, RT-PCMR showed good agreement for net flow, peak flow rate, and pulmonary–systemic flow ratio (Qp/Qs), without significant bias (p > 0.05) and slightly underestimated peak velocity 7.9% in the aorta and 8.6% in the main pulmonary artery (MPA). In patients, RT-PCMR slightly underestimated peak flow rate (aorta, 6.2%; MPA; 4.6%) and peak velocity (aorta,12.7%; MPA, 10.4%). A sub-analysis of six patients scanned at both 0.55T and 3T showed close agreement between field strengths. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the feasibility of our RT-PCMR sequence on a commercial 0.55T system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pervaiz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fcb6c1c9540dea80e763https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020166
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper