PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters3 citations

Hard X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy for Depth-Resolved Analysis of Optoelectronic and Photoelectrochemical Devices

View Full Paper
CFChao FengYLYanbo Li

Key Points

  • The aim is to highlight advances in hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for analyzing buried interfaces in devices.
  • Laboratory-based hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES) used for 20-30 nm probing depths
  • Analytical strategies include multienergy excitation and angle-resolved detection
  • Inelastic-background modeling and Auger-parameter analysis applied for depth-resolved quantification
  • Case studies cover a variety of optoelectronic and photoelectrochemical systems
  • Successfully quantified band offsets, band bending, and interface dipoles in devices
  • Highlighted challenges like limited laboratory photon flux and the need for stable operando cells
  • Identified opportunities for improved measurement protocols and data-driven analysis

Abstract

Laboratory-based hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES) extends conventional XPS into the multi-keV regime, enabling 20-30 nm probing depths while preserving high chemical-state sensitivity and energy resolution. This Perspective highlights recent advances that establish HAXPES as a practical and quantitative tool for characterizing buried interfaces in optoelectronic and photoelectrochemical devices. We discuss analytical strategies (multienergy excitation, angle-resolved detection, inelastic-background modeling, and Auger-parameter analysis) that permit depth-resolved quantification of band offsets, band bending, interface dipoles, and chemical gradients while distinguishing initial-state effects from final-state screening. Representative case studies span perovskite, organic, quantum-dot, and chalcogenide photovoltaics; oxide-based optoelectronic systems; catalyst-semiconductor and protection-semiconductor junctions; and operando solid-liquid measurements that track oxidation-state evolution and ion redistribution. We also outline key challenges including cross-instrument calibration, limited laboratory photon flux, and the development of stable operando cells. Finally, we identify opportunities in standardized measurement protocols, data-driven spectral analysis, and correlative in situ and operando methods that directly link the buried electronic structure to device performance and long-term stability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd18c1c9540dea80ed00https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c03611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper