PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Advanced Biomedical Research0 citationsOpen Access

A Comparative Study of the Effect of Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed HCG With Dual Trigger in Poor Responder Poseidon Group 4 Patients in Antagonist IVF Cycles

View Full Paper
ENElham NaghshinehFFFarnoosh FarahbodHTHatav G. Tehrani

Key Points

  • To compare the effects of Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed HCG versus Dual Trigger on IVF outcomes in poor responders.
  • Randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
  • Involved 90 infertile women with decreased ovarian reserve
  • Used antagonist IVF regimen with specific dosing of gonadotropins and injections
  • Conducted oocyte retrieval 36 hours post HCG administration.
  • Higher rates of chemical pregnancy and implantation in Novel Dual Trigger group, but not statistically significant
  • Lower frequency of zero oocytes and fetus in Novel Dual Trigger group but not statistically significant

Abstract

Background: Decreased Ovarian Reserve (DOR) is a significant challenge in infertility treatment. This study, which compared the effects of Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), holds promise for improving IVF outcomes. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial on 90 infertile women. An antagonist regimen was used, which included approximately 300 units of gonadotropins, consisting of 150 units of Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and 150 units of Synal-F. After administering a dose of Strotide injection followed by Decapeptyl and Ovitrelle injections, 12 hours later, a single HCG 5000-unit injection was administered, and 36 hours later, the puncture procedure was performed. Results: Although the frequency of chemical pregnancy, Implantation rate, and ongoing pregnancy was higher in the Novel double trigger with delayed HCG group, and the frequency of zero oocytes and fetus was lower in this group, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This study showed that using Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed HCG, compared to Dual Trigger, did not significantly differ in the number of oocytes, embryos, or secondary pregnancy outcomes. These findings suggest that the Novel Dual Trigger and Delayed HCG methods could be equally effective in improving IVF outcomes for poor responder patients, providing a potential alternative for ovarian stimulation in these cases and instilling optimism for the future of IVF treatments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Naghshineh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fdc7c1c9540dea80f7a0https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_286_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper