PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Journal of Orthopaedic Research®2 citations

Machine Learning Based Prediction of Tibial Insert Thickness in Total Knee Arthroplasty From Intraoperative Knee Joint Laxity Data

View Full Paper
PCPrudhvi Tej ChinimilliLALaurent AngibaudAJAmaury Jung

Key Points

  • This research aims to find a reliable method for predicting tibial insert thickness during total knee arthroplasty using intraoperative knee joint laxity data.
  • Analyzed data from 1661 tibia-first TKA procedures conducted by 11 surgeons.
  • Developed surgeon-dependent and surgeon-independent predictive models.
  • Employed three machine learning algorithms: logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost.
  • Utilized feature selection techniques including correlation-based feature selection, recursive feature elimination, and Shapley additive explanations.
  • Surgeon-dependent model achieved 58.3% exact prediction accuracy and 93.1% accuracy within 2 mm.
  • Surgeon-independent model showed improved accuracy of 61.3% exact prediction and 94.2% within 2 mm.
  • Both models indicated potential to standardize tibial insert thickness selection and enhance decision-making.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) represents the gold standard for relieving pain and restoring function in patients with end‐stage knee osteoarthritis. Soft‐tissue balancing is critical to achieving successful outcomes. One of the factors that contribute to successful soft‐tissue management relates to tibial insert thickness, an intraoperative surgical decision based on surgeon experience and preference. This study investigates the relationship between knee joint laxity curves and tibial insert thickness selection in tibia‐first TKA and explores predictive modeling to support intraoperative decision making. Data from 1661 tibia‐first TKA cases performed by 11 surgeons were used to develop surgeon‐dependent and surgeon‐independent models. Surgeon‐dependent models are personalized to individual surgeons, leveraging data specific to each surgeon. While surgeon‐independent models are developed utilizing data from seven expert surgeons (> 70 cases each) to provide generalized recommendations. Three supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB) were employed with feature selection methods: correlation‐based feature selection (CFS), recursive features elimination (RFE), and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The best surgeon‐dependent model achieved a mean exact prediction accuracy of 58.3%, mean prediction within 1 mm accuracy of 73%, and mean prediction within 2 mm accuracy of 93.1%. The top‐performing surgeon‐independent model demonstrated improved accuracy, with a mean exact prediction accuracy of 61.3%, mean prediction within 1 mm accuracy of 73.3%, and mean prediction within 2 mm accuracy of 94.2%. These findings suggest that ML models can assist in standardizing tibial insert thickness selection, potentially reducing variability and improving intraoperative decision‐making in TKA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chinimilli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fdc7c1c9540dea80f7d9https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70155
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: Clinical value of intra-operative measurement2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Standardizing definitions of the total knee alignment techniques: recommendations by the Personalized Arthroplasty Society2025 · 20 citations
  3. 3Design and Cadaveric Validation of a Novel Device to Quantify Knee Stability During Total Knee Arthroplasty2012 · 18 citations
  4. 4Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care2018 · 2,326 citations
  5. 5Knee replacement2012 · 1,164 citations