PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

X-Ray Dose Audit and Potential Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Select Hospitals in Kaduna State, Nigeria

View Full Paper
AIAbeabe IshiekwenAAAbubakar Sadiq AliyuMNMaduakonam Simon Nwafor

Key Points

  • The audit aims to measure x-ray doses in common radiographic procedures to establish local reference levels.
  • Conducted dose audit using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for various x-ray examinations
  • Measured entrance surface dose (ESD) on 420 randomly selected adult patients
  • Included common radiographic projections such as chest PA, skull PA, and lumbar spine AP
  • Mean ESD for chest PA was 0.44 – 0.9 mGy; lateral was 0.9 – 1.5 mGy
  • Mean ESD for skull PA was 2.0 – 4.7 mGy; lateral was 1.7 – 3.4 mGy
  • Mean ESD for lumbar spine AP was 3.4 - 7.8 mGy; lateral was 6.8 – 11.3 mGy
  • Mean ESD for abdomen AP was 3.6 – 6.2 mGy; pelvic AP was 2.4 – 6.9 mGy
  • Dose levels were below IAEA recommendations, indicating safe practices.

Abstract

Background: Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology is fundamental to providing information to practitioners regarding the level of their doses and to ensure adequate optimization of the protection of patients presenting for radiological examinations. The introduction and implementation of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in diagnostic radiology has proven to be a potent tool for quality control and dose reduction. This has not been comprehensively addressed in Nigeria. Objective: To carryout dose audit of patients presenting for common radiographic projections in select hospitals in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Methodology: Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to measure entrance surface dose (ESD) on 420 randomly selected adult patients presenting for x-ray examination of the chest PA/Lateral, skull PA/Lateral, lumbar spine AP/Lateral, abdomen and pelvic AP, respectively. Results were compared with existing literature. Results: The range of the mean ESD determined for the study population on various x-ray examinations were: chest PA (0.44 – 0.9 mGy), and lateral (0.9 – 1.5 mGy); skull PA (2.0 – 4.7 mGy), and lateral (1.7 – 3.4 mGy); lumbar spine AP (3.4 -7.8 mGy), and lateral (6.8 –11.3 mGy); abdomen AP (3.6 – 6.2 mGy); and pelvic AP (2.4 – 6.9 mGy). Comparison showed dose levels were below IAEA recommendations. Conclusion: In the absence of arbitrary high doses, practice is generally safe and will not result in unwarranted hazards to the patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ishiekwen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe13c1c9540dea80fd05https://doi.org/10.82547/jrrs.vol32no1.74
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper