PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics0 citationsOpen Access

Novel R Shiny Tool for Survival Analysis With Time-Varying Covariate in Oncology Studies: Overcoming Biases and Enhancing Collaboration

View Full Paper
YLYimei B. LiYQYang QiaoIowa State UniversityFGFei GaoFred Hutch Cancer Center

Key Points

  • Evaluate the impact of time-varying covariates on survival analysis in oncology, particularly after CAR-T therapy.
  • Developed an R Shiny tool integrating multiple survival analysis models and curves.
  • Analyzed the effect of hematopoietic cell transplantation post-CAR-T on leukemia-free survival.
  • Conducted simulations to assess biases in survival analysis methods under varying conditions.
  • Consistent findings between naïve and time-dependent Cox models for leukemia-free survival.
  • Notable differences in results from landmark analyses based on chosen landmark time.
  • Simulations indicated increased bias in naïve methods when time-varying covariates changed late.

Abstract

PURPOSE Our study is motivated by evaluating the role of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for ALL, a debated topic. Because patients may receive HCT at different times after CAR-T infusion or never, HCT post–CAR-T should be considered as a time-varying covariate (TVC). METHODS Standard Cox models and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves (naïve method) assume that TVC status is known and fixed at baseline, which can yield biased estimates. Landmark analysis is a popular alternative but depends on a chosen landmark time. Time-dependent (TD) Cox model is better suited for TVC although visualizing survival curves is complex. The newly proposed Smith-Zee method generates appropriate survival curves from TD Cox models. RESULTS To address these challenges, we developed an open-source R Shiny tool integrating multiple models (naïve Cox, landmark Cox, and TD Cox) and curves (naïve KM, landmark KM, Smith-Zee, and Extended KM) to facilitate TVC analysis. Reanalysis of post–CAR-T HCT's effect on leukemia-free survival (LFS) showed consistent results between naïve and TD Cox models, whereas landmark analyses varied by landmark time. A separate data analysis of chronic graft-versus-host disease and survival showed that substantial differences emerged across statistical methods. Simulations revealed increased bias in naïve methods when TVC changed late and minimal bias when TVC changes occurred early relative to time to events. CONCLUSION We recommend TD Cox models and Smith-Zee curves for robust TVC analysis. Our R Shiny tool supports standardized analyses without requiring data sharing, thereby promoting collaboration across different institutions and providing a practical tool to advance survival analysis in oncology research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe13c1c9540dea80fd55https://doi.org/10.1200/cci-25-00225
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper