PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Head & Neck0 citationsOpen Access

Oncological Outcomes of Salvage Oropharyngectomy in Irradiated Neck for Recurrent or Metachronous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

View Full Paper
JSJade SaykalySVS. VergèzADAgnès Dupret‐Bories

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the oncological outcomes and predictors of success following salvage oropharyngectomy in patients with recurrent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Single-center retrospective study
  • Included patients from 2014 to 2023
  • Focused on recurrent or metachronous oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
  • Five-year overall survival was 31.7%
  • Disease-specific survival was 58.5%
  • Local recurrence-free survival was 55.2%
  • pN+ and pT status ≥3 significantly predicted overall survival
  • Metachronous cases showed lower hazard ratios for survival outcomes

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate oncological outcomes and their predictors following salvage oropharyngectomy. Methods This single‐center retrospective study included patients who underwent a salvage oropharyngectomy in an irradiated neck for recurrent or metachronous oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) between 2014 and 2023. Results Ninety‐four patients were included. Five‐year overall survival (OS), disease‐specific survival (DSS), and local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) were 31.7%, 58.5%, and 55.2%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, pN+ status (HR 2.32; p = 0.031), pT status ≥ 3 (HR 2.03; p = 0.020), and age (HR 1.05; p = 0.014) were associated with OS. DSS was associated with pT status ≥ 3 (HR 5.24; p < 0.001), metachronous (vs. recurrent) OPSCC (HR 0.32; p = 0.006), and cN+ status (HR 2.31; p = 0.053). LRFS was associated with metachronous OPSCC (HR 0.30; p = 0.002) and pT status ≥ 3 (HR 3.60; p = 0.001). Conclusions This last‐resort procedure is associated with poor survival outcomes. In this series, patients with p16‐positive OPSCC did not fare better than their p16‐negative counterparts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saykaly et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe13c1c9540dea80fe5ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70182
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper