PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging0 citations

Accelerated deep-learning assisted dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement in children and adolescents

View Full Paper
BBB BurkhardtFCF M CallaghanCKC J Kellenberger

Key Result

Deep-learning dark-blood LGE provided comparable lesion-to-myocardium contrast and overall image quality to bright-blood LGE in pediatric patients, with faster acquisition times.

Key Points

  • To compare the effectiveness of a deep-learning dark-blood sequence to a bright-blood LGE sequence in pediatric myocardial imaging.
  • Analyzed images from pediatric patients at a congenital heart hospital who had both LGE imaging sequences.
  • Recorded the location and extent of LGE-positive lesions by two experienced readers.
  • Measured signal intensity in lesions and normal myocardium, and calculated contrast based on these measurements.
  • Identified 25 patients with LGE and 25 age-matched controls.
  • Overall image quality was similar between dark-blood and bright-blood sequences.
  • Dark-blood LGE was acquired significantly faster than bright-blood LGE.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=50)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a deep-learning assisted dark-blood LGE sequence provide comparable image quality and contrast to a bright-blood LGE sequence in pediatric patients?

P
Population
50 children and adolescents (25 with LGE and 25 age-matched controls) who underwent both bright-blood and dark-blood LGE imaging.
E
Exposure
Deep-learning assisted dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequence
C
Comparator
Deep-learning bright-blood phase sensitive inversion recovery sequence
O
Outcome
Signal intensity contrast between lesions and myocardium, overall image quality, and visibility of anatomical detailssurrogate

Deep-learning assisted dark-blood LGE provides comparable image quality and contrast to bright-blood LGE but with faster acquisition, making it a viable alternative for pediatric patients.

Abstract

Abstract Background Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging detects focal myocardial fibrosis and inflammation, for example in myocarditis. Short-axis stacks typically require multiple breath-holds over several minutes, which children may find difficult to perform. A deep-learning assisted dark-blood LGE sequence may reduce acquisition time compared to a deep-learning bright-blood phase sensitive inversion recovery sequence. Purpose We hypothesized that dark-blood imaging shows focal myocardial hyperenhancement, with better scar-to-myocardium contrast and with faster acquisition than bright-blood imaging. Methods Images from consecutive patients at a tertiary congenital heart hospital who had undergone LGE imaging with both bright-blood and dark-blood sequences were analyzed. Two experienced readers independently recorded location and extent of LGE positive lesions and measured signal intensity both in lesions and in normal myocardium. Signal intensity was averaged over three regions of interest in every sample, and contrast was calculated as the difference in signal intensities between lesion and myocardium. Overall image quality and visibility of anatomical details was graded on a scale from 1=poor to 4=excellent. Results 25 patients with LGE were identified (age 11.1 +/- 5.2 years; 8 female), as well as 25 age-matched controls (age 11.2 +/- 5.3 years; p = 0.965; 8 female). Overall image quality did not differ between sequences, while one of two observers found anatomical details to be better distinguishable by bright-blood imaging. The signal intensity contrast between lesions and myocardium was comparable between sequences. Conclusion(s) The deep-learning dark-blood LGE sequence shows focal myocardial hyperenhancement with comparable contrast to bright-blood LGE. Anatomical detail is possibly slightly less visible with dark-blood compared to bright-blood LGE, but overall image quality is similar. Dark-blood LGE is acquired much faster than bright-blood LGE, thus making it a viable alternative in pediatric patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Burkhardt et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Myocardial fibrosis and inflammation (n=50). Deep-learning assisted dark-blood LGE sequence vs. Deep-learning bright-blood phase sensitive inversion recovery sequence was evaluated on Signal intensity contrast between lesions and myocardium, and overall image quality. Deep-learning dark-blood LGE provided comparable lesion-to-myocardium contrast and overall image quality to bright-blood LGE in pediatric patients, with faster acquisition times.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe35c1c9540dea8100c5https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf367.389
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper